Which has the lower trailing P/E, BOX or EPAM?

EPAM has the lower trailing P/E: BOX trades at 50.25 and EPAM at 13.62. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, BOX or EPAM?

Over the past five years, EPAM grew revenue faster — BOX at a 8.86% CAGR versus EPAM at 13.08%.

Is BOX or EPAM more profitable?

BOX runs the higher net margin — BOX at 9.18% versus EPAM at 7.15%.

How have BOX and EPAM total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, BOX delivered 10.09% and EPAM delivered 3.92% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Box, Inc. (BOX) vs EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM)

A side-by-side comparison of Box, Inc. and EPAM Systems, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 16, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

BOX

Box, Inc.

$4.52B

$32.65TechnologyAt close: Aug 14, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

EPAM

EPAM Systems, Inc.

$5.25B

$100.50TechnologyAt close: Aug 14, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Total return — BOX vs EPAM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

BOX +155.1% (+9.8%/yr)EPAM +48.5% (+4.0%/yr)BOX compounded faster over this window

BOX EPAM

BOX vs EPAM: by the numbers

•EPAM is the larger company ($5.25B vs $4.52B market cap).
•EPAM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (13.62 vs 50.25 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•BOX converts more revenue to profit (9.18% vs 7.15% net margin).
•EPAM grew revenue faster over the past five years (13.08% vs 8.86% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BOX	EPAM
P/E ratio	50.25	13.62
Forward P/E	25.37	7.71
P/S ratio	3.79	0.94
P/B ratio	28.87	1.49
EV / EBITDA	33.11	6.48
FCF yield	7.71%	9.18%

Profitability

Metric	BOX	EPAM
Gross margin	79.56%	28.33%
Operating margin	8.64%	10.26%
Net margin	9.18%	7.15%
ROE	69.93%	11.42%
ROIC	11.19%	9.82%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BOX	EPAM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	8.86%	13.08%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	2.86%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	10.17%	6.36%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	4.36%	-30.22%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, BOX or EPAM?: EPAM has the lower trailing P/E: BOX trades at 50.25 and EPAM at 13.62. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, BOX or EPAM?: Over the past five years, EPAM grew revenue faster — BOX at a 8.86% CAGR versus EPAM at 13.08%.
Is BOX or EPAM more profitable?: BOX runs the higher net margin — BOX at 9.18% versus EPAM at 7.15%.
How have BOX and EPAM total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, BOX delivered 10.09% and EPAM delivered 3.92% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full BOX analysis Full EPAM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Box P/E ratio EPAM Systems P/E ratio Box ROE EPAM Systems ROE Box operating margin EPAM Systems operating margin Box revenue growth EPAM Systems revenue growth Box free cash flow EPAM Systems free cash flow

Box & EPAM Systems appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 16, 2026.