Brookfield Corporation (BN) vs Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC)
MMC leads on 8 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Brookfield Corporation and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
BN
Brookfield Corporation
$45.21Financial Services
MMC
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
$171.14Financial Services
Total return — BN vs MMC
growth of $100 · last 30yBN +5871.1%MMC +1062.2%BN compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
BN MMC
BN vs MMC: by the numbers
- •BN is the larger company ($100.98B vs $89.82B market cap).
- •MMC trades at the lower earnings multiple (20.30 vs 87.53 P/E).
- •MMC converts more revenue to profit (14.26% vs 1.74% net margin).
- •MMC grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.28% vs 4.12% CAGR).
- •MMC pays the higher dividend yield (2.10% vs 0.42%).
Which is better, BN or MMC?
Metric tally: BN 7 · MMC 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueMMC(lower P/E)
GrowthMMC(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeMMC(higher dividend yield)
QualityMMC(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | BN | MMC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 87.53 | 20.30● |
| Forward P/E | — | 16.60 |
| P/S ratio | 1.40● | 3.11 |
| P/B ratio | 2.28● | 5.48 |
| PEG ratio | 0.58● | 7.85 |
| EV / EBITDA | 11.59● | 14.59 |
| FCF yield | — | 5.96% |
Profitability
| Metric | BN | MMC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 35.28%● | 20.12% |
| Operating margin | 28.32%● | 21.70% |
| Net margin | 1.74% | 14.26%● |
| ROE | 2.84% | 26.51%● |
| ROIC | 3.19% | 12.12%● |
Dividends
| Metric | BN | MMC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.42% | 2.10%● |
| Payout ratio | 36.54% | 42.45% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BN | MMC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 4.12% | 9.28%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -12.76% | 16.34%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -24.87% | 8.27%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 12.09%● | 10.12% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, BN or MMC?
- It depends on your goal. value: MMC (lower P/E); growth: MMC (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: MMC (higher dividend yield); quality: MMC (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MMC leads 8 to 7.
- Is BN or MMC cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, MMC is cheaper: BN trades at a 87.53 P/E and MMC at 20.30.
- Which has grown faster, BN or MMC?
- Over the past five years, MMC grew revenue faster — BN at a 4.12% CAGR versus MMC at 9.28%.
- Does BN or MMC pay a bigger dividend?
- BN yields 0.42% and MMC yields 2.10% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is BN or MMC more profitable?
- MMC runs the higher net margin — BN at 1.74% versus MMC at 14.26%.
- Which has been the better investment, BN or MMC?
- Over the past 10-year, BN delivered the higher annualized total return — BN at 14.89% versus MMC at 13.86%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Brookfield P/E ratioMarsh & McLennan Companies P/E ratioBrookfield dividend yieldMarsh & McLennan Companies dividend yieldBrookfield ROEMarsh & McLennan Companies ROEBrookfield operating marginMarsh & McLennan Companies operating marginBrookfield revenue growthMarsh & McLennan Companies revenue growthBrookfield free cash flowMarsh & McLennan Companies free cash flow
Brookfield & Marsh & McLennan Companies appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.