Beamr Imaging Ltd. (BMR) vs UTStarcom Holdings Corp. (UTSI)
A side-by-side comparison of Beamr Imaging Ltd. and UTStarcom Holdings Corp. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
BMR
Beamr Imaging Ltd.
$1.55TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
UTSI
UTStarcom Holdings Corp.
$2.28TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — BMR vs UTSI
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 4yBMR -56.4% (-18.7%/yr)UTSI -44.8% (-13.8%/yr)UTSI compounded faster over this window
BMR UTSI
BMR vs UTSI: by the numbers
- •BMR is the larger company ($24M vs $22M market cap).
- •Both run net losses; UTSI's is the smaller (-104.29% vs -194.57% net margin).
- •Both shrank revenue over the past five years; BMR's decline was smaller (-0.52% vs -12.89% CAGR).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BMR | UTSI |
|---|---|---|
| P/S ratio | N/A | 1.49 |
| P/B ratio | 2.06 | 0.70 |
Profitability
| Metric | BMR | UTSI |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 89.72% | 5.12% |
| Operating margin | -208.60% | -95.31% |
| Net margin | -194.57% | -104.29% |
| ROE | -38.19% | -49.23% |
| ROIC | -40.82% | -52.40% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BMR | UTSI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -0.52% | -12.89% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | N/A | -11.70% |
Frequently asked
- Which has grown faster, BMR or UTSI?
- Neither grew: over the past five years both shrank revenue, with BMR's decline the smaller — BMR at a -0.52% CAGR versus UTSI at -12.89%.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.