Blackrock 2037 Municipal Target Term Trust (BMN) vs Hypoport SE (HYPOF)
Over the past 3 years, HYPOF lagged BMN — -8.14% vs 5.02% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
A side-by-side comparison of Blackrock 2037 Municipal Target Term Trust and Hypoport SE across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Total return — BMN vs HYPOF
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 4yMetrics side by side
Did HYPOF beat BMN?
Over the past 3 years, HYPOF lagged BMN — -8.14% vs 5.02% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Total return (annualized)
| Metric | BMN | HYPOF |
|---|---|---|
| Total return (1Y) | 8.58% | -55.69% |
| Total return CAGR (3Y) | 5.02% | -8.14% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | N/A | -29.44% |
BMN is an index fund, so valuation, profitability, and per-company growth metrics don't apply — the head-to-head here is total return (price plus reinvested dividends).
Frequently asked
- Has HYPOF beaten BMN?
- Over the past 3 years, HYPOF lagged BMN — -8.14% vs 5.02% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 6, 2026.