Blackrock 2037 Municipal Target Term Trust (BMN) vs Franklin Universal Trust (FT)
Over the past 3 years, FT outperformed BMN — 13.87% vs 5.62% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
A side-by-side comparison of Blackrock 2037 Municipal Target Term Trust and Franklin Universal Trust across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 24, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — BMN vs FT
growth of $100 · last 4yMetrics side by side
Did FT beat BMN?
Over the past 3 years, FT outperformed BMN — 13.87% vs 5.62% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Total return (annualized)
| Metric | BMN | FT |
|---|---|---|
| Total return (1Y) | 7.52% | 13.09%● |
| Total return CAGR (3Y) | 5.62% | 13.87%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | — | 7.02% |
| Total return CAGR (10Y) | — | 8.35% |
BMN is an index fund, so valuation, profitability, and per-company growth metrics don't apply — the head-to-head here is total return (price plus reinvested dividends).
Frequently asked
- Has FT beaten BMN?
- Over the past 3 years, FT outperformed BMN — 13.87% vs 5.62% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 24, 2026.