Blackrock 2037 Municipal Target Term Trust (BMN) vs Franklin Universal Trust (FT)
Over the past 3 years, FT outperformed BMN — 11.32% vs 5.66% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
A side-by-side comparison of Blackrock 2037 Municipal Target Term Trust and Franklin Universal Trust across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Total return — BMN vs FT
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 4yMetrics side by side
Did FT beat BMN?
Over the past 3 years, FT outperformed BMN — 11.32% vs 5.66% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Total return (annualized)
| Metric | BMN | FT |
|---|---|---|
| Total return (1Y) | 1.76% | 0.94% |
| Total return CAGR (3Y) | 5.66% | 11.32% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 4.66% |
| Total return CAGR (10Y) | N/A | 7.70% |
BMN is an index fund, so valuation, profitability, and per-company growth metrics don't apply — the head-to-head here is total return (price plus reinvested dividends).
Frequently asked
- Has FT beaten BMN?
- Over the past 3 years, FT outperformed BMN — 11.32% vs 5.66% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 10, 2026.