Which has the lower trailing P/E, BMI or SITE?

SITE has the lower trailing P/E: BMI trades at 29.90 and SITE at 24.59. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, BMI or SITE?

Over the past five years, BMI grew revenue faster — BMI at a 13.55% CAGR versus SITE at 10.04%.

Does BMI or SITE pay a bigger dividend?

BMI pays a dividend (1.26% yield), while SITE has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is BMI or SITE more profitable?

BMI runs the higher net margin — BMI at 14.27% versus SITE at 3.41%.

How have BMI and SITE total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, BMI delivered 15.45% and SITE delivered 9.55% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Badger Meter, Inc. (BMI) vs SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. (SITE)

A side-by-side comparison of Badger Meter, Inc. and SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 2, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

BMI

Badger Meter, Inc.

$3.71B

$127.96IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 3:54 PM EDT

SITE

SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.

$3.91B

$89.51IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 3:55 PM EDT

Total return — BMI vs SITE

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

BMI +325.6% (+15.6%/yr)SITE +147.3% (+9.5%/yr)BMI compounded faster over this window

BMI SITE

BMI vs SITE: by the numbers

•SITE is the larger company ($3.91B vs $3.71B market cap).
•SITE trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (24.59 vs 29.90 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•BMI converts more revenue to profit (14.27% vs 3.41% net margin).
•BMI grew revenue faster over the past five years (13.55% vs 10.04% CAGR).
•BMI pays a dividend (1.26% yield), while SITE has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BMI	SITE
P/E ratio	29.90	24.59
Forward P/E	28.74	21.60
PEG ratio	1.29	5.91
P/S ratio	4.21	0.82
P/B ratio	5.43	2.32
EV / EBITDA	18.64	10.01
FCF yield	4.05%	6.64%

Profitability

Metric	BMI	SITE
Gross margin	41.31%	35.13%
Operating margin	18.58%	5.28%
Net margin	14.27%	3.41%
ROE	18.40%	9.65%
ROIC	14.81%	7.00%

Dividends

Metric	BMI	SITE
Dividend yield	1.26%	N/A
Payout ratio	38.32%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BMI	SITE
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	13.55%	10.04%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	23.18%	3.68%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	15.68%	3.21%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	5.52%	-15.17%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, BMI or SITE?: SITE has the lower trailing P/E: BMI trades at 29.90 and SITE at 24.59. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, BMI or SITE?: Over the past five years, BMI grew revenue faster — BMI at a 13.55% CAGR versus SITE at 10.04%.
Does BMI or SITE pay a bigger dividend?: BMI pays a dividend (1.26% yield), while SITE has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is BMI or SITE more profitable?: BMI runs the higher net margin — BMI at 14.27% versus SITE at 3.41%.
How have BMI and SITE total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, BMI delivered 15.45% and SITE delivered 9.55% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full BMI analysis Full SITE analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Badger Meter P/E ratio SiteOne Landscape Supply P/E ratio Badger Meter dividend yield Badger Meter ROE SiteOne Landscape Supply ROE Badger Meter operating margin SiteOne Landscape Supply operating margin Badger Meter revenue growth SiteOne Landscape Supply revenue growth Badger Meter free cash flow SiteOne Landscape Supply free cash flow

Badger Meter & SiteOne Landscape Supply appear in these rankings

25+ Year Dividend Growers Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 2, 2026.