Badger Meter, Inc. (BMI) vs Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK)
A side-by-side comparison of Badger Meter, Inc. and Star Bulk Carriers Corp. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
BMI
Badger Meter, Inc.
$123.67IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 2:30 PM EDT
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
$29.98IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 2:25 PM EDT
Total return — BMI vs SBLK
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yBMI +317.8% (+15.4%/yr)SBLK +1153.8% (+28.8%/yr)SBLK compounded faster over this window
BMI SBLK
BMI vs SBLK: by the numbers
- •BMI is the larger company ($3.58B vs $3.34B market cap).
- •SBLK trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (11.76 vs 28.89 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •SBLK converts more revenue to profit (23.87% vs 14.27% net margin).
- •BMI grew revenue faster over the past five years (13.55% vs 6.02% CAGR).
- •SBLK pays the higher dividend yield (6.29% vs 1.31%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BMI | SBLK |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 28.89 | 11.76 |
| Forward P/E | 27.78 | 6.39 |
| PEG ratio | 1.25 | 0.24 |
| P/S ratio | 4.07 | 2.78 |
| P/B ratio | 5.25 | 1.33 |
| EV / EBITDA | 18.00 | 7.85 |
| FCF yield | 4.19% | 8.56% |
Profitability
| Metric | BMI | SBLK |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 41.31% | 22.48% |
| Operating margin | 18.58% | 13.49% |
| Net margin | 14.27% | 23.87% |
| ROE | 18.40% | 11.42% |
| ROIC | 14.81% | 9.25% |
Dividends
| Metric | BMI | SBLK |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.31% | 6.29% |
| Payout ratio | 38.32% | 73.73% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BMI | SBLK |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 13.55% | 6.02% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 23.18% | 48.83% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 15.68% | 13.57% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 4.62% | 17.36% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, BMI or SBLK?
- SBLK has the lower trailing P/E: BMI trades at 28.89 and SBLK at 11.76. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, BMI or SBLK?
- Over the past five years, BMI grew revenue faster — BMI at a 13.55% CAGR versus SBLK at 6.02%.
- Does BMI or SBLK pay a bigger dividend?
- BMI yields 1.31% and SBLK yields 6.29% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is BMI or SBLK more profitable?
- SBLK runs the higher net margin — BMI at 14.27% versus SBLK at 23.87%.
- How have BMI and SBLK total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, BMI delivered 15.03% and SBLK delivered 28.24% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Badger Meter P/E ratioStar Bulk Carriers P/E ratioBadger Meter dividend yieldStar Bulk Carriers dividend yieldBadger Meter ROEStar Bulk Carriers ROEBadger Meter operating marginStar Bulk Carriers operating marginBadger Meter revenue growthStar Bulk Carriers revenue growthBadger Meter free cash flowStar Bulk Carriers free cash flow
Badger Meter & Star Bulk Carriers appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.