BioLife Solutions, Inc. (BLFS) vs LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. (LMAT)
A side-by-side comparison of BioLife Solutions, Inc. and LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
BLFS
BioLife Solutions, Inc.
$38.61HealthcareDelayed quote: Oct 5, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
LMAT
LeMaitre Vascular, Inc.
$79.66HealthcareDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 11:04 AM EDT
Total return — BLFS vs LMAT
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yBLFS +2119.0% (+36.3%/yr)LMAT +349.0% (+16.2%/yr)BLFS compounded faster over this window
BLFS LMAT
BLFS vs LMAT: by the numbers
- •BLFS is the larger company ($1.89B vs $1.82B market cap).
- •LMAT trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (27.95 vs 37.72 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •BLFS converts more revenue to profit (49.06% vs 25.02% net margin).
- •LMAT grew revenue faster over the past five years (11.76% vs 6.78% CAGR).
- •LMAT pays a dividend (1.17% yield), while BLFS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BLFS | LMAT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 37.72 | 27.95 |
| Forward P/E | 64.35 | 27.73 |
| PEG ratio | N/A | 1.44 |
| P/S ratio | 18.35 | 6.94 |
| P/B ratio | 4.49 | 4.33 |
| EV / EBITDA | 170.26 | 21.83 |
| FCF yield | N/A | 4.06% |
Profitability
| Metric | BLFS | LMAT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 64.48% | 72.90% |
| Operating margin | -1.12% | 29.46% |
| Net margin | 49.06% | 25.02% |
| ROE | 12.01% | 15.62% |
| ROIC | 1.72% | 9.81% |
Dividends
| Metric | BLFS | LMAT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 1.17% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 33.33% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BLFS | LMAT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 6.78% | 11.76% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 19.42% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 13.06% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -0.77% | 9.79% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, BLFS or LMAT?
- LMAT has the lower trailing P/E: BLFS trades at 37.72 and LMAT at 27.95. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, BLFS or LMAT?
- Over the past five years, LMAT grew revenue faster — BLFS at a 6.78% CAGR versus LMAT at 11.76%.
- Does BLFS or LMAT pay a bigger dividend?
- LMAT pays a dividend (1.17% yield), while BLFS has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is BLFS or LMAT more profitable?
- BLFS runs the higher net margin — BLFS at 49.06% versus LMAT at 25.02%.
- How have BLFS and LMAT total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, BLFS delivered 36.27% and LMAT delivered 16.21% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
BioLife Solutions P/E ratioLeMaitre Vascular P/E ratioLeMaitre Vascular dividend yieldBioLife Solutions ROELeMaitre Vascular ROEBioLife Solutions operating marginLeMaitre Vascular operating marginBioLife Solutions revenue growthLeMaitre Vascular revenue growthBioLife Solutions free cash flowLeMaitre Vascular free cash flow
BioLife Solutions & LeMaitre Vascular appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.