Is BKR or FANG cheaper?

On trailing earnings, BKR is cheaper: BKR trades at a 18.07 P/E and FANG at 211.66.

Which has grown faster, BKR or FANG?

Over the past five years, FANG grew revenue faster — BKR at a 6.81% CAGR versus FANG at 37.44%.

Does BKR or FANG pay a bigger dividend?

BKR yields 1.63% and FANG yields 2.45% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is BKR or FANG more profitable?

BKR runs the higher net margin — BKR at 11.17% versus FANG at 2.65%.

Which has been the better investment, BKR or FANG?

Over the past 10-year, FANG delivered the higher annualized total return — BKR at 8.76% versus FANG at 10.32%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Baker Hughes Company (BKR) vs Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG)

BKR leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Baker Hughes Company and Diamondback Energy, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 27, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Diamondback Energy, Inc.

$50.61B

$179.91Energy

Total return — BKR vs FANG

growth of $100 · last 14y

BKR +81.0%FANG +928.1%FANG compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

BKR FANG

BKR vs FANG: by the numbers

•BKR is the larger company ($56.11B vs $50.61B market cap).
•BKR trades at the lower earnings multiple (18.07 vs 211.66 P/E).
•BKR converts more revenue to profit (11.17% vs 2.65% net margin).
•FANG grew revenue faster over the past five years (37.44% vs 6.81% CAGR).
•FANG pays the higher dividend yield (2.45% vs 1.63%).

Which is better, BKR or FANG?

Metric tally: BKR 9 · FANG 7

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueBKR(lower P/E)

GrowthFANG(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeFANG(higher dividend yield)

QualityBKR(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BKR	FANG
P/E ratio	18.07●	211.66
Forward P/E	19.77	—
P/S ratio	2.02●	3.35
P/B ratio	2.92	1.39●
PEG ratio	0.36●	8.32
EV / EBITDA	11.85	7.51●
FCF yield	4.07%●	3.13%

Profitability

Metric	BKR	FANG
Gross margin	23.57%	41.83%●
Operating margin	12.96%	32.73%●
Net margin	11.17%●	2.65%
ROE	16.13%●	1.10%
ROIC	11.64%●	6.00%

Dividends

Metric	BKR	FANG
Dividend yield	1.63%	2.45%●
Payout ratio	35.11%	76.79%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BKR	FANG
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	6.81%	37.44%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	49.99%●	25.44%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	22.74%	91.40%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	22.01%●	18.00%

Frequently asked

Which is better, BKR or FANG?: It depends on your goal. value: BKR (lower P/E); growth: FANG (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: FANG (higher dividend yield); quality: BKR (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, BKR leads 9 to 7.
Is BKR or FANG cheaper?: On trailing earnings, BKR is cheaper: BKR trades at a 18.07 P/E and FANG at 211.66.
Which has grown faster, BKR or FANG?: Over the past five years, FANG grew revenue faster — BKR at a 6.81% CAGR versus FANG at 37.44%.
Does BKR or FANG pay a bigger dividend?: BKR yields 1.63% and FANG yields 2.45% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is BKR or FANG more profitable?: BKR runs the higher net margin — BKR at 11.17% versus FANG at 2.65%.
Which has been the better investment, BKR or FANG?: Over the past 10-year, FANG delivered the higher annualized total return — BKR at 8.76% versus FANG at 10.32%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full BKR analysis Full FANG analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Baker Hughes P/E ratio Diamondback Energy P/E ratio Baker Hughes dividend yield Diamondback Energy dividend yield Baker Hughes ROE Diamondback Energy ROE Baker Hughes operating margin Diamondback Energy operating margin Baker Hughes revenue growth Diamondback Energy revenue growth Baker Hughes free cash flow Diamondback Energy free cash flow

Baker Hughes & Diamondback Energy appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 27, 2026.