Is BKR or ET cheaper?

On trailing earnings, ET is cheaper: BKR trades at a 18.01 P/E and ET at 14.34.

Which has grown faster, BKR or ET?

Over the past five years, ET grew revenue faster — BKR at a 6.81% CAGR versus ET at 15.06%.

Does BKR or ET pay a bigger dividend?

BKR yields 1.63% and ET yields 6.95% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is BKR or ET more profitable?

BKR runs the higher net margin — BKR at 11.17% versus ET at 5.41%.

Which has been the better investment, BKR or ET?

Over the past 10-year, ET delivered the higher annualized total return — BKR at 8.73% versus ET at 11.87%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Baker Hughes Co (BKR) vs Energy Transfer LP (ET)

BKR leads on 9 of 17 compared metrics, though ET is the cheaper stock.

A side-by-side comparison of Baker Hughes Co and Energy Transfer LP across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Total return — BKR vs ET

growth of $100 · last 20y

BKR +14.1%ET +232.7%ET compounded faster

BKR ET

BKR vs ET: by the numbers

•ET is the larger company ($66.14B vs $55.93B market cap).
•ET trades at the lower earnings multiple (14.34 vs 18.01 P/E).
•BKR converts more revenue to profit (11.17% vs 5.41% net margin).
•ET grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.06% vs 6.81% CAGR).
•ET pays the higher dividend yield (6.95% vs 1.63%).

Which is better, BKR or ET?

Metric tally: BKR 9 · ET 8

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueET(lower P/E)

GrowthET(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeET(higher dividend yield)

QualityBKR(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BKR	ET
P/E ratio	18.01	14.34●
Forward P/E	19.70	12.09●
P/S ratio	2.01	0.74●
P/B ratio	2.91	1.93●
PEG ratio	0.36●	2.23
EV / EBITDA	11.28	9.30●
FCF yield	4.08%	5.50%●

Profitability

Metric	BKR	ET
Gross margin	23.57%●	22.91%
Operating margin	12.96%●	11.11%
Net margin	11.17%●	5.41%
ROE	16.13%●	14.02%
ROIC	11.64%●	7.17%

Dividends

Metric	BKR	ET
Dividend yield	1.63%	6.95%●
Payout ratio	35.11%	98.16%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BKR	ET
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	6.81%	15.06%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	49.99%●	0.25%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	22.74%●	-11.11%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	21.95%●	21.42%

Frequently asked

Which is better, BKR or ET?: It depends on your goal. value: ET (lower P/E); growth: ET (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: ET (higher dividend yield); quality: BKR (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, BKR leads 9 to 8.
Is BKR or ET cheaper?: On trailing earnings, ET is cheaper: BKR trades at a 18.01 P/E and ET at 14.34.
Which has grown faster, BKR or ET?: Over the past five years, ET grew revenue faster — BKR at a 6.81% CAGR versus ET at 15.06%.
Does BKR or ET pay a bigger dividend?: BKR yields 1.63% and ET yields 6.95% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is BKR or ET more profitable?: BKR runs the higher net margin — BKR at 11.17% versus ET at 5.41%.
Which has been the better investment, BKR or ET?: Over the past 10-year, ET delivered the higher annualized total return — BKR at 8.73% versus ET at 11.87%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full BKR analysis Full ET analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Baker Hughes P/E ratio Energy Transfer LP P/E ratio Baker Hughes dividend yield Energy Transfer LP dividend yield Baker Hughes ROE Energy Transfer LP ROE Baker Hughes operating margin Energy Transfer LP operating margin Baker Hughes revenue growth Energy Transfer LP revenue growth Baker Hughes free cash flow Energy Transfer LP free cash flow

Baker Hughes & Energy Transfer LP appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 25, 2026.