Which has the lower trailing P/E, BKR or ET?

ET has the lower trailing P/E: BKR trades at 19.79 and ET at 12.43. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, BKR or ET?

Over the past five years, ET grew revenue faster — BKR at a 6.26% CAGR versus ET at 14.94%.

Does BKR or ET pay a bigger dividend?

BKR yields 1.49% and ET yields 6.63% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is BKR or ET more profitable?

BKR runs the higher net margin — BKR at 11.17% versus ET at 5.99%.

How have BKR and ET total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, BKR delivered 9.23% and ET delivered 10.81% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Baker Hughes Company (BKR) vs Energy Transfer LP (ET)

A side-by-side comparison of Baker Hughes Company and Energy Transfer LP across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 8, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

BKR

Baker Hughes Company

$61.10B

$61.55EnergyAt close: Aug 7, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Energy Transfer LP

$69.27B

$20.13EnergyAt close: Aug 7, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Total return — BKR vs ET

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 21y

BKR +74.5%ET +1334.9%ET compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

BKR ET

BKR vs ET: by the numbers

•ET is the larger company ($69.27B vs $61.10B market cap).
•ET trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (12.43 vs 19.79 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•BKR converts more revenue to profit (11.17% vs 5.99% net margin).
•ET grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.94% vs 6.26% CAGR).
•ET pays the higher dividend yield (6.63% vs 1.49%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BKR	ET
P/E ratio	19.79	12.43
Forward P/E	24.27	12.88
P/S ratio	2.21	0.67
P/B ratio	3.08	1.38
PEG ratio	0.40	2.23
EV / EBITDA	12.68	9.18
FCF yield	5.10%	5.25%

Profitability

Metric	BKR	ET
Gross margin	23.57%	24.11%
Operating margin	12.92%	10.60%
Net margin	11.17%	5.99%
ROE	15.56%	12.39%
ROIC	11.64%	7.17%

Dividends

Metric	BKR	ET
Dividend yield	1.49%	6.63%
Payout ratio	35.11%	98.16%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BKR	ET
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	6.26%	14.94%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	49.99%	0.25%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	22.27%	11.51%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	26.83%	26.39%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, BKR or ET?: ET has the lower trailing P/E: BKR trades at 19.79 and ET at 12.43. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, BKR or ET?: Over the past five years, ET grew revenue faster — BKR at a 6.26% CAGR versus ET at 14.94%.
Does BKR or ET pay a bigger dividend?: BKR yields 1.49% and ET yields 6.63% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is BKR or ET more profitable?: BKR runs the higher net margin — BKR at 11.17% versus ET at 5.99%.
How have BKR and ET total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, BKR delivered 9.23% and ET delivered 10.81% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full BKR analysis Full ET analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Baker Hughes P/E ratio Energy Transfer LP P/E ratio Baker Hughes dividend yield Energy Transfer LP dividend yield Baker Hughes ROE Energy Transfer LP ROE Baker Hughes operating margin Energy Transfer LP operating margin Baker Hughes revenue growth Energy Transfer LP revenue growth Baker Hughes free cash flow Energy Transfer LP free cash flow

Baker Hughes & Energy Transfer LP appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 8, 2026.