Baker Hughes Company (BKR) vs Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (EPAC)
A side-by-side comparison of Baker Hughes Company and Enerpac Tool Group Corp. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: BKR is classified in Energy; EPAC is classified in Industrials. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
BKR
Baker Hughes Company
$58.46EnergyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
EPAC
Enerpac Tool Group Corp.
$37.09IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — BKR vs EPAC
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30yBKR +364.0%EPAC +2967.5%EPAC compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
BKR EPAC
BKR vs EPAC: by the numbers
- •BKR is the larger company ($58.00B vs $1.91B market cap).
- •BKR trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (19.48 vs 19.71 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •EPAC converts more revenue to profit (14.72% vs 11.17% net margin).
- •BKR grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.26% vs 5.10% CAGR).
- •BKR pays the higher dividend yield (1.52% vs 0.11%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BKR | EPAC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 19.48 | 19.71 |
| Forward P/E | 24.37 | 18.70 |
| P/S ratio | 2.18 | 2.84 |
| P/B ratio | 3.00 | 4.24 |
| PEG ratio | 0.39 | 2.78 |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.40 | 11.97 |
| FCF yield | 5.68% | 6.24% |
Profitability
| Metric | BKR | EPAC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 23.57% | 49.05% |
| Operating margin | 12.92% | 21.76% |
| Net margin | 11.17% | 14.72% |
| ROE | 15.42% | 22.01% |
| ROIC | 11.64% | 15.12% |
Dividends
| Metric | BKR | EPAC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.52% | 0.11% |
| Payout ratio | 35.11% | 2.33% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BKR | EPAC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 6.26% | 5.10% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 49.99% | 169.53% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 24.53% | 34.85% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 25.54% | 6.62% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, BKR or EPAC?
- BKR has the lower trailing P/E: BKR trades at 19.48 and EPAC at 19.71. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, BKR or EPAC?
- Over the past five years, BKR grew revenue faster — BKR at a 6.26% CAGR versus EPAC at 5.10%.
- Does BKR or EPAC pay a bigger dividend?
- BKR yields 1.52% and EPAC yields 0.11% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is BKR or EPAC more profitable?
- EPAC runs the higher net margin — BKR at 11.17% versus EPAC at 14.72%.
- How have BKR and EPAC total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, BKR delivered 8.86% and EPAC delivered 3.89% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Baker Hughes P/E ratioEnerpac Tool P/E ratioBaker Hughes dividend yieldEnerpac Tool dividend yieldBaker Hughes ROEEnerpac Tool ROEBaker Hughes operating marginEnerpac Tool operating marginBaker Hughes revenue growthEnerpac Tool revenue growthBaker Hughes free cash flowEnerpac Tool free cash flow
Baker Hughes & Enerpac Tool appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.