Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) vs AT&T Inc. (T)
BKNG and T are evenly matched — 8 metrics each of 16.
A side-by-side comparison of Booking Holdings Inc. and AT&T Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
BKNG
Booking Holdings Inc.
$164.94Consumer Cyclical
T
AT&T Inc.
$23.58Communication Services
Total return — BKNG vs T
growth of $100 · last 27yBKNG +896.0%T -32.8%BKNG compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
BKNG T
BKNG vs T: by the numbers
- •T is the larger company ($163.84B vs $127.81B market cap).
- •T trades at the lower earnings multiple (7.94 vs 21.75 P/E).
- •BKNG converts more revenue to profit (22.23% vs 16.89% net margin).
- •BKNG grew revenue faster over the past five years (37.43% vs -6.06% CAGR).
- •T pays the higher dividend yield (4.71% vs 0.97%).
Which is better, BKNG or T?
Metric tally: BKNG 8 · T 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueT(lower P/E)
GrowthBKNG(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeT(higher dividend yield)
QualityBKNG(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | BKNG | T |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 21.75 | 7.94● |
| Forward P/E | 13.38 | 9.28● |
| P/S ratio | 4.73 | 1.31● |
| P/B ratio | — | 1.51 |
| PEG ratio | 0.14 | 0.08● |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.07 | 5.88● |
| FCF yield | 6.90% | 10.47%● |
Profitability
| Metric | BKNG | T |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 100.00%● | 79.66% |
| Operating margin | 34.28%● | 19.35% |
| Net margin | 22.23%● | 16.89% |
| ROE | -96.88% | 19.48%● |
| ROIC | 50.82%● | 5.57% |
Dividends
| Metric | BKNG | T |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.97% | 4.71%● |
| Payout ratio | 24.14% | 36.51% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BKNG | T |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 37.43%● | -6.06% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 158.62%● | 8.15% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 39.83%● | -10.02% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 12.81%● | 7.79% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, BKNG or T?
- It depends on your goal. value: T (lower P/E); growth: BKNG (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: T (higher dividend yield); quality: BKNG (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, they are evenly matched.
- Is BKNG or T cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, T is cheaper: BKNG trades at a 21.75 P/E and T at 7.94.
- Which has grown faster, BKNG or T?
- Over the past five years, BKNG grew revenue faster — BKNG at a 37.43% CAGR versus T at -6.06%.
- Does BKNG or T pay a bigger dividend?
- BKNG yields 0.97% and T yields 4.71% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is BKNG or T more profitable?
- BKNG runs the higher net margin — BKNG at 22.23% versus T at 16.89%.
- Which has been the better investment, BKNG or T?
- Over the past 10-year, BKNG delivered the higher annualized total return — BKNG at 12.30% versus T at 4.53%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Booking P/E ratioAT&T P/E ratioBooking dividend yieldAT&T dividend yieldBooking ROEAT&T ROEBooking operating marginAT&T operating marginBooking revenue growthAT&T revenue growthBooking free cash flowAT&T free cash flow
Booking & AT&T appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.