Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) vs Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT)
BKNG leads on 12 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Booking Holdings Inc. and Fortinet, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 16, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
BKNG
Booking Holdings Inc.
$174.64Consumer Cyclical
FTNT
Fortinet, Inc.
$149.49Technology
Total return — BKNG vs FTNT
growth of $100 · last 17yBKNG +2003.9%FTNT +8668.1%FTNT compounded faster
BKNG FTNT
BKNG vs FTNT: by the numbers
- •BKNG is the larger company ($136.64B vs $106.55B market cap).
- •BKNG trades at the lower earnings multiple (23.03 vs 57.72 P/E).
- •FTNT converts more revenue to profit (27.49% vs 22.23% net margin).
- •BKNG grew revenue faster over the past five years (37.43% vs 21.13% CAGR).
- •BKNG pays a dividend (0.92% yield) while FTNT does not currently pay one.
Which is better, BKNG or FTNT?
Metric tally: BKNG 12 · FTNT 3It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueBKNG(lower P/E)
GrowthBKNG(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityBKNG(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BKNG | FTNT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 23.03● | 57.72 |
| Forward P/E | 14.17● | 43.73 |
| P/S ratio | 5.01● | 15.62 |
| P/B ratio | — | 112.20 |
| PEG ratio | 0.15● | 4.54 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.88● | 40.65 |
| FCF yield | 6.51%● | 2.19% |
Profitability
| Metric | BKNG | FTNT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 100.00%● | 80.67% |
| Operating margin | 34.28%● | 31.06% |
| Net margin | 22.23% | 27.49%● |
| ROE | -96.88% | 197.48%● |
| ROIC | 50.82%● | 28.75% |
Dividends
| Metric | BKNG | FTNT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.92% | — |
| Payout ratio | 24.14% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BKNG | FTNT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 37.43%● | 21.13% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 158.62%● | 32.39% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 39.83%● | 21.24% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 14.42% | 25.88%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, BKNG or FTNT?
- It depends on your goal. value: BKNG (lower P/E); growth: BKNG (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: BKNG (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, BKNG leads 12 to 3.
- Is BKNG or FTNT cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, BKNG is cheaper: BKNG trades at a 23.03 P/E and FTNT at 57.72.
- Which has grown faster, BKNG or FTNT?
- Over the past five years, BKNG grew revenue faster — BKNG at a 37.43% CAGR versus FTNT at 21.13%.
- Does BKNG or FTNT pay a bigger dividend?
- BKNG pays a dividend (0.92% yield) while FTNT does not currently pay one.
- Is BKNG or FTNT more profitable?
- FTNT runs the higher net margin — BKNG at 22.23% versus FTNT at 27.49%.
- Which has been the better investment, BKNG or FTNT?
- Over the past 10-year, FTNT delivered the higher annualized total return — BKNG at 13.03% versus FTNT at 36.12%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Booking P/E ratioFortinet P/E ratioBooking dividend yieldFortinet dividend yieldBooking ROEFortinet ROEBooking operating marginFortinet operating marginBooking revenue growthFortinet revenue growthBooking free cash flowFortinet free cash flow
Booking & Fortinet appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 16, 2026.