Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) vs Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (EPAC)
BKNG leads on 11 of 14 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Booking Holdings Inc. and Enerpac Tool Group Corp. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
BKNG
Booking Holdings Inc.
$164.94Consumer Cyclical
EPAC
Enerpac Tool Group Corp.
$35.05Industrials
Total return — BKNG vs EPAC
growth of $100 · last 27yBKNG +896.0%EPAC +1274.5%EPAC compounded faster
BKNG EPAC
BKNG vs EPAC: by the numbers
- •BKNG is the larger company ($127.81B vs $1.85B market cap).
- •BKNG trades at the lower earnings multiple (21.75 vs 21.91 P/E).
- •BKNG converts more revenue to profit (22.23% vs 13.69% net margin).
- •BKNG grew revenue faster over the past five years (37.43% vs 6.64% CAGR).
- •BKNG pays the higher dividend yield (0.97% vs 0.11%).
Which is better, BKNG or EPAC?
Metric tally: BKNG 11 · EPAC 3It depends on what you're optimizing for:
GrowthBKNG(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeBKNG(higher dividend yield)
QualityBKNG(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | BKNG | EPAC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 21.75 | 21.91 |
| Forward P/E | 13.38● | 18.50 |
| P/S ratio | 4.73 | 2.96● |
| P/B ratio | — | 4.54 |
| PEG ratio | 0.14● | 2.78 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.07 | 13.91 |
| FCF yield | 6.90%● | 5.98% |
Profitability
| Metric | BKNG | EPAC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 100.00%● | 48.58% |
| Operating margin | 34.28%● | 20.52% |
| Net margin | 22.23%● | 13.69% |
| ROE | -96.88% | 21.00%● |
| ROIC | 50.82%● | 15.12% |
Dividends
| Metric | BKNG | EPAC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.97%● | 0.11% |
| Payout ratio | 24.14% | 2.33% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BKNG | EPAC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 37.43%● | 6.64% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 158.62% | 169.53%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 39.83%● | 31.53% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 12.81%● | 6.02% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, BKNG or EPAC?
- It depends on your goal. growth: BKNG (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: BKNG (higher dividend yield); quality: BKNG (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, BKNG leads 11 to 3.
- Is BKNG or EPAC cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, BKNG is cheaper: BKNG trades at a 21.75 P/E and EPAC at 21.91.
- Which has grown faster, BKNG or EPAC?
- Over the past five years, BKNG grew revenue faster — BKNG at a 37.43% CAGR versus EPAC at 6.64%.
- Does BKNG or EPAC pay a bigger dividend?
- BKNG yields 0.97% and EPAC yields 0.11% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is BKNG or EPAC more profitable?
- BKNG runs the higher net margin — BKNG at 22.23% versus EPAC at 13.69%.
- Which has been the better investment, BKNG or EPAC?
- Over the past 10-year, BKNG delivered the higher annualized total return — BKNG at 12.30% versus EPAC at 3.09%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Booking P/E ratioEnerpac Tool P/E ratioBooking dividend yieldEnerpac Tool dividend yieldBooking ROEEnerpac Tool ROEBooking operating marginEnerpac Tool operating marginBooking revenue growthEnerpac Tool revenue growthBooking free cash flowEnerpac Tool free cash flow
Booking & Enerpac Tool appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.