Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) vs Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (EPAC)
A side-by-side comparison of Booking Holdings Inc. and Enerpac Tool Group Corp. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: BKNG is classified in Consumer Cyclical; EPAC is classified in Industrials. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
BKNG
Booking Holdings Inc.
$173.92Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
EPAC
Enerpac Tool Group Corp.
$35.22IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — BKNG vs EPAC
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yBKNG +204.8% (+11.8%/yr)EPAC +54.1% (+4.4%/yr)BKNG compounded faster over this window
BKNG EPAC
BKNG vs EPAC: by the numbers
- •BKNG is the larger company ($134.77B vs $1.82B market cap).
- •BKNG trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (19.29 vs 19.90 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •BKNG converts more revenue to profit (25.53% vs 14.72% net margin).
- •BKNG grew revenue faster over the past five years (31.52% vs 5.10% CAGR).
- •BKNG pays the higher dividend yield (0.92% vs 0.11%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BKNG | EPAC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 19.29 | 19.90 |
| Forward P/E | 16.64 | 17.10 |
| P/S ratio | 4.77 | 2.86 |
| P/B ratio | N/A | 4.28 |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.30 | 12.07 |
| FCF yield | 7.08% | 6.19% |
Profitability
| Metric | BKNG | EPAC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 100.00% | 49.05% |
| Operating margin | 34.49% | 21.76% |
| Net margin | 25.53% | 14.72% |
| ROE | N/A | 22.01% |
| ROIC | 71.23% | 15.21% |
Dividends
| Metric | BKNG | EPAC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.92% | 0.11% |
| Payout ratio | 17.83% | 2.26% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BKNG | EPAC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 31.52% | 5.10% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 158.62% | 169.53% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 56.15% | 34.85% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 14.07% | 8.14% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, BKNG or EPAC?
- BKNG has the lower trailing P/E: BKNG trades at 19.29 and EPAC at 19.90. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, BKNG or EPAC?
- Over the past five years, BKNG grew revenue faster — BKNG at a 31.52% CAGR versus EPAC at 5.10%.
- Does BKNG or EPAC pay a bigger dividend?
- BKNG yields 0.92% and EPAC yields 0.11% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is BKNG or EPAC more profitable?
- BKNG runs the higher net margin — BKNG at 25.53% versus EPAC at 14.72%.
- How have BKNG and EPAC total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, BKNG delivered 12.15% and EPAC delivered 5.00% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Booking P/E ratioEnerpac Tool P/E ratioBooking dividend yieldEnerpac Tool dividend yieldBooking ROEEnerpac Tool ROEBooking operating marginEnerpac Tool operating marginBooking revenue growthEnerpac Tool revenue growthBooking free cash flowEnerpac Tool free cash flow
Booking & Enerpac Tool appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 10, 2026.