The Buckle, Inc. (BKE) vs Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT)
BKE leads on 12 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of The Buckle, Inc. and Liquidity Services, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 28, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
BKE
The Buckle, Inc.
$43.24Consumer Cyclical
LQDT
Liquidity Services, Inc.
$39.09Consumer Cyclical
Total return — BKE vs LQDT
growth of $100 · last 20yBKE +160.5%LQDT +218.1%LQDT compounded faster
BKE LQDT
BKE vs LQDT: by the numbers
- •BKE is the larger company ($2.23B vs $1.22B market cap).
- •BKE trades at the lower earnings multiple (9.92 vs 42.03 P/E).
- •BKE converts more revenue to profit (16.85% vs 6.30% net margin).
- •LQDT grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.76% vs 3.91% CAGR).
- •BKE pays a dividend (3.24% yield) while LQDT does not currently pay one.
Which is better, BKE or LQDT?
Metric tally: BKE 12 · LQDT 4It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueBKE(lower P/E)
GrowthLQDT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityBKE(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BKE | LQDT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 9.92● | 42.03 |
| Forward P/E | 10.63● | 25.97 |
| P/S ratio | 1.68● | 2.63 |
| P/B ratio | 4.81● | 5.69 |
| PEG ratio | 1.78 | 0.80● |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.59● | 21.33 |
| FCF yield | 10.02%● | 6.16% |
Profitability
| Metric | BKE | LQDT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 48.87%● | 45.61% |
| Operating margin | 21.10%● | 8.37% |
| Net margin | 16.85%● | 6.30% |
| ROE | 48.26%● | 13.62% |
| ROIC | 23.63%● | 11.42% |
Dividends
| Metric | BKE | LQDT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.24% | — |
| Payout ratio | 33.57% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BKE | LQDT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 3.91% | 16.76%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 9.32%● | -0.58% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -8.21% | 6.73%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 0.47% | 12.34%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, BKE or LQDT?
- It depends on your goal. value: BKE (lower P/E); growth: LQDT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: BKE (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, BKE leads 12 to 4.
- Is BKE or LQDT cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, BKE is cheaper: BKE trades at a 9.92 P/E and LQDT at 42.03.
- Which has grown faster, BKE or LQDT?
- Over the past five years, LQDT grew revenue faster — BKE at a 3.91% CAGR versus LQDT at 16.76%.
- Does BKE or LQDT pay a bigger dividend?
- BKE pays a dividend (3.24% yield) while LQDT does not currently pay one.
- Is BKE or LQDT more profitable?
- BKE runs the higher net margin — BKE at 16.85% versus LQDT at 6.30%.
- Which has been the better investment, BKE or LQDT?
- Over the past 10-year, LQDT delivered the higher annualized total return — BKE at 9.37% versus LQDT at 18.18%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Buckle P/E ratioLiquidity Services P/E ratioBuckle dividend yieldLiquidity Services dividend yieldBuckle ROELiquidity Services ROEBuckle operating marginLiquidity Services operating marginBuckle revenue growthLiquidity Services revenue growthBuckle free cash flowLiquidity Services free cash flow
Buckle & Liquidity Services appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 28, 2026.