Which has the lower trailing P/E, BKE or LQDT?

BKE has the lower trailing P/E: BKE trades at 9.74 and LQDT at 42.75. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, BKE or LQDT?

Over the past five years, LQDT grew revenue faster — BKE at a 2.68% CAGR versus LQDT at 15.03%.

Does BKE or LQDT pay a bigger dividend?

BKE pays a dividend (2.58% yield), while LQDT has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is BKE or LQDT more profitable?

BKE runs the higher net margin — BKE at 16.62% versus LQDT at 6.79%.

How have BKE and LQDT total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, BKE delivered 15.64% and LQDT delivered 15.91% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

The Buckle, Inc. (BKE) vs Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT)

A side-by-side comparison of The Buckle, Inc. and Liquidity Services, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

BKE

The Buckle, Inc.

$2.18B

$42.27Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 25, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

LQDT

Liquidity Services, Inc.

$1.36B

$43.61Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 25, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — BKE vs LQDT

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

BKE +317.5% (+15.4%/yr)LQDT +317.8% (+15.4%/yr)LQDT compounded faster over this window

BKE LQDT

BKE vs LQDT: by the numbers

•BKE is the larger company ($2.18B vs $1.36B market cap).
•BKE trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (9.74 vs 42.75 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•BKE converts more revenue to profit (16.62% vs 6.79% net margin).
•LQDT grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.03% vs 2.68% CAGR).
•BKE pays a dividend (2.58% yield), while LQDT has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BKE	LQDT
P/E ratio	9.74	42.75
Forward P/E	9.83	26.43
P/S ratio	1.64	2.78
P/B ratio	4.45	5.77
EV / EBITDA	7.71	21.11
FCF yield	8.79%	6.62%

Profitability

Metric	BKE	LQDT
Gross margin	48.95%	46.56%
Operating margin	20.84%	9.00%
Net margin	16.62%	6.79%
ROE	45.17%	14.10%
ROIC	22.24%	11.85%

Dividends

Metric	BKE	LQDT
Dividend yield	2.58%	N/A
Payout ratio	24.19%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BKE	LQDT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	2.68%	15.03%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-5.36%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-8.68%	9.39%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	10.63%	11.87%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, BKE or LQDT?: BKE has the lower trailing P/E: BKE trades at 9.74 and LQDT at 42.75. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, BKE or LQDT?: Over the past five years, LQDT grew revenue faster — BKE at a 2.68% CAGR versus LQDT at 15.03%.
Does BKE or LQDT pay a bigger dividend?: BKE pays a dividend (2.58% yield), while LQDT has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is BKE or LQDT more profitable?: BKE runs the higher net margin — BKE at 16.62% versus LQDT at 6.79%.
How have BKE and LQDT total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, BKE delivered 15.64% and LQDT delivered 15.91% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full BKE analysis Full LQDT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Buckle P/E ratio Liquidity Services P/E ratio Buckle dividend yield Buckle ROE Liquidity Services ROE Buckle operating margin Liquidity Services operating margin Buckle revenue growth Liquidity Services revenue growth Buckle free cash flow Liquidity Services free cash flow

Buckle & Liquidity Services appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.