The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (BK) vs Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MRSH)
BK leads on 8 of 14 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
BK
The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation
$146.44Financial Services
MRSH
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
$165.96Financial Services
Total return — BK vs MRSH
growth of $100 · last 30yBK +955.0%MRSH +891.5%BK compounded faster
BK MRSH
BK vs MRSH: by the numbers
- •BK is the larger company ($97.40B vs $79.96B market cap).
- •BK trades at the lower earnings multiple (18.15 vs 20.75 P/E).
- •BK converts more revenue to profit (14.66% vs 14.26% net margin).
- •BK grew revenue faster over the past five years (20.87% vs 9.28% CAGR).
- •MRSH pays the higher dividend yield (2.17% vs 1.45%).
Which is better, BK or MRSH?
Metric tally: BK 8 · MRSH 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueBK(lower P/E)
GrowthBK(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeMRSH(higher dividend yield)
QualityMRSH(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BK | MRSH |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 18.15● | 20.75 |
| Forward P/E | 16.68 | 15.95● |
| P/S ratio | 2.51● | 2.93 |
| P/B ratio | 2.28● | 5.54 |
| PEG ratio | 0.56● | 7.85 |
Profitability
| Metric | BK | MRSH |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 50.52%● | 42.37% |
| Operating margin | 18.58% | 21.70%● |
| Net margin | 14.66%● | 14.26% |
| ROE | 13.31% | 26.94%● |
| ROIC | 6.38% | 12.12%● |
Dividends
| Metric | BK | MRSH |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.45% | 2.17%● |
| Payout ratio | 28.42% | 42.45% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BK | MRSH |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 20.87%● | 9.28% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 14.21% | 16.34%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 27.74%● | 5.32% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, BK or MRSH?
- It depends on your goal. value: BK (lower P/E); growth: BK (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: MRSH (higher dividend yield); quality: MRSH (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, BK leads 8 to 6.
- Is BK or MRSH cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, BK is cheaper: BK trades at a 18.15 P/E and MRSH at 20.75.
- Which has grown faster, BK or MRSH?
- Over the past five years, BK grew revenue faster — BK at a 20.87% CAGR versus MRSH at 9.28%.
- Does BK or MRSH pay a bigger dividend?
- BK yields 1.45% and MRSH yields 2.17% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is BK or MRSH more profitable?
- BK runs the higher net margin — BK at 14.66% versus MRSH at 14.26%.
- Which has been the better investment, BK or MRSH?
- Over the past 10-year, BK delivered the higher annualized total return — BK at 16.63% versus MRSH at 11.71%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Bank of New York Mellon P/E ratioMarsh & McLennan Companies P/E ratioBank of New York Mellon dividend yieldMarsh & McLennan Companies dividend yieldBank of New York Mellon ROEMarsh & McLennan Companies ROEBank of New York Mellon operating marginMarsh & McLennan Companies operating marginBank of New York Mellon revenue growthMarsh & McLennan Companies revenue growthBank of New York Mellon free cash flowMarsh & McLennan Companies free cash flow
Bank of New York Mellon & Marsh & McLennan Companies appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 25, 2026.