BlackRock Multi-Sector Income Trust (BIT) vs Franklin Universal Trust (FT)
FT leads on 10 of 11 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of BlackRock Multi-Sector Income Trust and Franklin Universal Trust across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 28, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
BIT
BlackRock Multi-Sector Income Trust
$12.34Financial Services
FT
Franklin Universal Trust
$8.05Financial Services
Total return — BIT vs FT
growth of $100 · last 13yBIT -38.3%FT +7.5%FT compounded faster
BIT FT
BIT vs FT: by the numbers
- •BIT is the larger company ($530M vs $202M market cap).
- •FT trades at the lower earnings multiple (3.00 vs 7.13 P/E).
- •FT converts more revenue to profit (179.50% vs 84.98% net margin).
- •FT grew revenue faster over the past five years (3.92% vs 2.07% CAGR).
- •BIT pays the higher dividend yield (12.03% vs 6.34%).
Which is better, BIT or FT?
Metric tally: BIT 1 · FT 10It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueFT(lower P/E)
GrowthFT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeBIT(higher dividend yield)
QualityFT(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BIT | FT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 7.13 | 3.00● |
| P/S ratio | 7.67 | 5.42● |
| P/B ratio | 0.89 | 0.89 |
Profitability
| Metric | BIT | FT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 83.53% | 86.88%● |
| Operating margin | 114.70% | 119.92%● |
| Net margin | 84.98% | 179.50%● |
| ROE | 9.82% | 29.45%● |
| ROIC | 5.98% | 8.38%● |
Dividends
| Metric | BIT | FT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 12.03%● | 6.34% |
| Payout ratio | 140.04% | 67.11% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BIT | FT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 2.07% | 3.92%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -10.31% | -3.82%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 1.72% | 6.97%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, BIT or FT?
- It depends on your goal. value: FT (lower P/E); growth: FT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: BIT (higher dividend yield); quality: FT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, FT leads 10 to 1.
- Is BIT or FT cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, FT is cheaper: BIT trades at a 7.13 P/E and FT at 3.00.
- Which has grown faster, BIT or FT?
- Over the past five years, FT grew revenue faster — BIT at a 2.07% CAGR versus FT at 3.92%.
- Does BIT or FT pay a bigger dividend?
- BIT yields 12.03% and FT yields 6.34% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is BIT or FT more profitable?
- FT runs the higher net margin — BIT at 84.98% versus FT at 179.50%.
- Which has been the better investment, BIT or FT?
- Over the past 10-year, FT delivered the higher annualized total return — BIT at 7.01% versus FT at 8.43%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
BlackRock Multi-Sector Income P/E ratioFranklin Universal P/E ratioBlackRock Multi-Sector Income dividend yieldFranklin Universal dividend yieldBlackRock Multi-Sector Income ROEFranklin Universal ROEBlackRock Multi-Sector Income operating marginFranklin Universal operating marginBlackRock Multi-Sector Income revenue growthFranklin Universal revenue growthBlackRock Multi-Sector Income free cash flowFranklin Universal free cash flow
BlackRock Multi-Sector Income & Franklin Universal appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 28, 2026.