Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. (BIO) vs Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (WBA)

A side-by-side comparison of Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. and Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total returnBIO vs WBA

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 29y
BIO +1878.8%WBA +180.0%BIO compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
101001k10kStart $10020012006201120162021$1,979$280
BIO WBA

BIO vs WBA: by the numbers

  • WBA is the larger company ($10.37B vs $8.95B market cap).
  • BIO is profitable (6.52% net margin) while WBA runs a net loss (-4.07%).
  • WBA grew revenue faster over the past five years (3.53% vs 0.29% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricBIOWBA
P/E ratio52.13N/A
Forward P/E35.007.65
P/S ratio3.290.07
P/B ratio1.241.44
EV / EBITDA21.48N/A
FCF yield4.19%5.60%

Profitability

MetricBIOWBA
Gross margin51.87%17.13%
Operating margin9.25%-2.02%
Net margin6.52%-4.07%
ROE2.46%-87.68%
ROIC2.04%-24.28%

Growth (annualized)

MetricBIOWBA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)0.29%3.53%
EPS CAGR (5Y)-26.27%N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)-7.57%-33.20%
Total return CAGR (5Y)-13.99%-16.99%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, BIO or WBA?
Over the past five years, WBA grew revenue faster — BIO at a 0.29% CAGR versus WBA at 3.53%.
Is BIO or WBA more profitable?
BIO runs the higher net margin — BIO at 6.52% versus WBA at -4.07%.
How have BIO and WBA total returns compared?
Over the past 10 years, BIO delivered 8.68% and WBA delivered -14.92% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.