Which has grown faster, BIO or WBA?

Over the past five years, WBA grew revenue faster — BIO at a -0.84% CAGR versus WBA at 3.53%.

Is BIO or WBA more profitable?

BIO runs the higher net margin — BIO at 6.52% versus WBA at -4.07%.

Which has been the better investment, BIO or WBA?

Over the past 10-year, BIO delivered the higher annualized total return — BIO at 6.91% versus WBA at -14.92%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. (BIO) vs Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (WBA)

BIO leads on 8 of 13 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. and Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

BIO

Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.

$7.73B

$285.94Healthcare

WBA

Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.

$10.37B

$11.98Healthcare

Total return — BIO vs WBA

growth of $100 · last 29y

BIO +1510.1%WBA +46.3%BIO compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

BIO WBA

BIO vs WBA: by the numbers

•WBA is the larger company ($10.37B vs $7.73B market cap).
•BIO is profitable (6.52% net margin) while WBA runs a net loss (-4.07%).
•WBA grew revenue faster over the past five years (3.53% vs -0.84% CAGR).

Which is better, BIO or WBA?

Metric tally: BIO 8 · WBA 5

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthWBA(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityBIO(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	BIO	WBA
P/E ratio	47.11	—
Forward P/E	28.69	7.65●
P/S ratio	2.98	0.07●
P/B ratio	1.13●	1.44
EV / EBITDA	20.01	—
FCF yield	4.63%	5.60%●

Profitability

Metric	BIO	WBA
Gross margin	51.87%●	17.13%
Operating margin	9.25%●	-2.02%
Net margin	6.52%●	-4.07%
ROE	2.46%●	-87.68%
ROIC	2.04%●	-24.28%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BIO	WBA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-0.84%	3.53%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-26.27%	5.73%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-7.57%●	-33.20%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-13.82%●	-16.99%

Frequently asked

Which is better, BIO or WBA?: It depends on your goal. growth: WBA (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: BIO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, BIO leads 8 to 5.
Which has grown faster, BIO or WBA?: Over the past five years, WBA grew revenue faster — BIO at a -0.84% CAGR versus WBA at 3.53%.
Is BIO or WBA more profitable?: BIO runs the higher net margin — BIO at 6.52% versus WBA at -4.07%.
Which has been the better investment, BIO or WBA?: Over the past 10-year, BIO delivered the higher annualized total return — BIO at 6.91% versus WBA at -14.92%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full BIO analysis Full WBA analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Bio-Rad Laboratories P/E ratio Walgreens Boots Alliance P/E ratio Bio-Rad Laboratories dividend yield Walgreens Boots Alliance dividend yield Bio-Rad Laboratories ROE Walgreens Boots Alliance ROE Bio-Rad Laboratories operating margin Walgreens Boots Alliance operating margin Bio-Rad Laboratories revenue growth Walgreens Boots Alliance revenue growth Bio-Rad Laboratories free cash flow Walgreens Boots Alliance free cash flow

Bio-Rad Laboratories & Walgreens Boots Alliance appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.