bioAffinity Technologies, Inc. (BIAF) vs Creative Medical Technology Holdings, Inc. (CELZ)

A side-by-side comparison of bioAffinity Technologies, Inc. and Creative Medical Technology Holdings, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total return — BIAF vs CELZ

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 4y
BIAF -99.8% (-79.8%/yr)CELZ -86.6% (-39.5%/yr)CELZ compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
01101001kStart $1002023202420252026$0$13
BIAF CELZ

BIAF vs CELZ: by the numbers

  • •BIAF is the larger company ($3M vs $2M market cap).
  • •Both run net losses; BIAF's is the smaller (-257.33% vs -201355.37% net margin).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricBIAFCELZ
P/S ratio0.43774.54
P/B ratio0.670.27

Profitability

MetricBIAFCELZ
Gross margin23.21%63.43%
Operating margin-171.58%-102380.23%
Net margin-257.33%-201355.37%
ROE-402.92%-69.79%
ROIC-237.93%-71.90%

Growth (annualized)

MetricBIAFCELZ
Revenue CAGR (5Y)N/A-50.85%
Total return CAGR (5Y)N/A-57.96%

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.