BHP Group Limited (BHP) vs The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW)
A side-by-side comparison of BHP Group Limited and The Sherwin-Williams Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 12, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
BHP
BHP Group Limited
$90.87Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Aug 12, 2026, 11:30 AM EDT
SHW
The Sherwin-Williams Company
$362.07Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Aug 12, 2026, 11:29 AM EDT
Total return — BHP vs SHW
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yBHP +488.2% (+19.4%/yr)SHW +304.0% (+15.0%/yr)BHP compounded faster over this window
BHP SHW
BHP vs SHW: by the numbers
- •BHP is the larger company ($230.84B vs $87.90B market cap).
- •BHP trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (10.57 vs 33.43 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •BHP converts more revenue to profit (20.10% vs 11.01% net margin).
- •SHW grew revenue faster over the past five years (4.44% vs 3.47% CAGR).
- •BHP pays the higher dividend yield (2.95% vs 0.88%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BHP | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 10.57 | 33.43 |
| Forward P/E | 17.94 | 30.07 |
| P/S ratio | 2.13 | 3.67 |
| P/B ratio | 4.54 | 23.25 |
| EV / EBITDA | 4.59 | 22.36 |
| FCF yield | 9.11% | 3.59% |
Profitability
| Metric | BHP | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 82.72% | 49.07% |
| Operating margin | 41.04% | 16.36% |
| Net margin | 20.10% | 11.01% |
| ROE | 42.93% | 69.74% |
| ROIC | 12.42% | 13.93% |
Dividends
| Metric | BHP | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.95% | 0.88% |
| Payout ratio | 74.72% | 30.64% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BHP | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 3.47% | 4.44% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 2.81% | 6.74% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 2.84% | -0.06% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 13.20% | 5.08% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, BHP or SHW?
- BHP has the lower trailing P/E: BHP trades at 10.57 and SHW at 33.43. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, BHP or SHW?
- Over the past five years, SHW grew revenue faster — BHP at a 3.47% CAGR versus SHW at 4.44%.
- Does BHP or SHW pay a bigger dividend?
- BHP yields 2.95% and SHW yields 0.88% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is BHP or SHW more profitable?
- BHP runs the higher net margin — BHP at 20.10% versus SHW at 11.01%.
- How have BHP and SHW total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, BHP delivered 19.71% and SHW delivered 14.94% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
BHP P/E ratioSherwin-Williams P/E ratioBHP dividend yieldSherwin-Williams dividend yieldBHP ROESherwin-Williams ROEBHP operating marginSherwin-Williams operating marginBHP revenue growthSherwin-Williams revenue growthBHP free cash flowSherwin-Williams free cash flow
BHP & Sherwin-Williams appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 12, 2026.