BHP Group Limited (BHP) vs The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW)
BHP leads on 13 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of BHP Group Limited and The Sherwin-Williams Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 28, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
BHP
BHP Group Limited
$81.02Basic Materials
SHW
The Sherwin-Williams Company
$344.07Basic Materials
Total return — BHP vs SHW
growth of $100 · last 30yBHP +663.6%SHW +4339.6%SHW compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
BHP SHW
BHP vs SHW: by the numbers
- •BHP is the larger company ($205.82B vs $84.86B market cap).
- •BHP trades at the lower earnings multiple (9.51 vs 33.02 P/E).
- •BHP converts more revenue to profit (20.10% vs 10.86% net margin).
- •SHW grew revenue faster over the past five years (4.87% vs 3.47% CAGR).
- •BHP pays the higher dividend yield (3.60% vs 0.93%).
Which is better, BHP or SHW?
Metric tally: BHP 13 · SHW 4It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueBHP(lower P/E)
GrowthSHW(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeBHP(higher dividend yield)
QualitySHW(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BHP | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 9.51● | 33.02 |
| Forward P/E | 15.64● | 29.35 |
| P/S ratio | 1.92● | 3.57 |
| P/B ratio | 4.09● | 19.26 |
| PEG ratio | 0.96● | 4.90 |
| EV / EBITDA | 4.16● | 22.10 |
| FCF yield | 10.12%● | 3.40% |
Profitability
| Metric | BHP | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 82.72%● | 49.12% |
| Operating margin | 41.04%● | 16.13% |
| Net margin | 20.10%● | 10.86% |
| ROE | 42.93% | 58.66%● |
| ROIC | 12.42% | 15.21%● |
Dividends
| Metric | BHP | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.60%● | 0.93% |
| Payout ratio | 82.02% | 30.83% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BHP | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 3.47% | 4.87%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 2.81% | 6.74%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -0.18%● | -2.44% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 12.20%● | 5.60% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, BHP or SHW?
- It depends on your goal. value: BHP (lower P/E); growth: SHW (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: BHP (higher dividend yield); quality: SHW (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, BHP leads 13 to 4.
- Is BHP or SHW cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, BHP is cheaper: BHP trades at a 9.51 P/E and SHW at 33.02.
- Which has grown faster, BHP or SHW?
- Over the past five years, SHW grew revenue faster — BHP at a 3.47% CAGR versus SHW at 4.87%.
- Does BHP or SHW pay a bigger dividend?
- BHP yields 3.60% and SHW yields 0.93% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is BHP or SHW more profitable?
- BHP runs the higher net margin — BHP at 20.10% versus SHW at 10.86%.
- Which has been the better investment, BHP or SHW?
- Over the past 10-year, BHP delivered the higher annualized total return — BHP at 20.21% versus SHW at 14.83%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
BHP P/E ratioSherwin-Williams P/E ratioBHP dividend yieldSherwin-Williams dividend yieldBHP ROESherwin-Williams ROEBHP operating marginSherwin-Williams operating marginBHP revenue growthSherwin-Williams revenue growthBHP free cash flowSherwin-Williams free cash flow
BHP & Sherwin-Williams appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 28, 2026.