BHP Group Limited (BHP) vs Newmont Corporation (NEM)
NEM leads on 9 of 15 compared metrics, though BHP is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of BHP Group Limited and Newmont Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 28, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
BHP
BHP Group Limited
$81.02Basic Materials
NEM
Newmont Corporation
$96.13Basic Materials
Total return — BHP vs NEM
growth of $100 · last 30yBHP +663.6%NEM +94.7%BHP compounded faster
BHP NEM
BHP vs NEM: by the numbers
- •BHP is the larger company ($205.82B vs $102.62B market cap).
- •BHP trades at the lower earnings multiple (9.51 vs 12.44 P/E).
- •NEM converts more revenue to profit (34.64% vs 20.10% net margin).
- •NEM grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.80% vs 3.47% CAGR).
- •BHP pays the higher dividend yield (3.60% vs 1.08%).
Which is better, BHP or NEM?
Metric tally: BHP 6 · NEM 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueBHP(lower P/E)
GrowthNEM(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeBHP(higher dividend yield)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BHP | NEM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 9.51● | 12.44 |
| Forward P/E | 15.64 | 8.44● |
| P/S ratio | 1.92● | 4.28 |
| P/B ratio | 4.09 | 2.99● |
| PEG ratio | 0.96 | 0.13● |
| EV / EBITDA | 4.16● | 6.47 |
| FCF yield | 10.12% | 11.75%● |
Profitability
| Metric | BHP | NEM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 82.72%● | 55.12% |
| Operating margin | 41.04% | 52.62%● |
| Net margin | 20.10% | 34.64%● |
| ROE | 42.93%● | 24.21% |
| ROIC | 12.42% | 12.23% |
Dividends
| Metric | BHP | NEM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.60%● | 1.08% |
| Payout ratio | 82.02% | 16.22% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BHP | NEM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 3.47% | 15.80%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 2.81% | 12.74%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -0.18% | 29.17%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 12.20% | 12.11% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, BHP or NEM?
- It depends on your goal. value: BHP (lower P/E); growth: NEM (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: BHP (higher dividend yield). Across all compared metrics, NEM leads 9 to 6.
- Is BHP or NEM cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, BHP is cheaper: BHP trades at a 9.51 P/E and NEM at 12.44.
- Which has grown faster, BHP or NEM?
- Over the past five years, NEM grew revenue faster — BHP at a 3.47% CAGR versus NEM at 15.80%.
- Does BHP or NEM pay a bigger dividend?
- BHP yields 3.60% and NEM yields 1.08% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is BHP or NEM more profitable?
- NEM runs the higher net margin — BHP at 20.10% versus NEM at 34.64%.
- Which has been the better investment, BHP or NEM?
- Over the past 10-year, BHP delivered the higher annualized total return — BHP at 20.21% versus NEM at 12.40%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
BHP P/E ratioNewmont P/E ratioBHP dividend yieldNewmont dividend yieldBHP ROENewmont ROEBHP operating marginNewmont operating marginBHP revenue growthNewmont revenue growthBHP free cash flowNewmont free cash flow
BHP & Newmont appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 28, 2026.