Which has the lower trailing P/E, BHP or NA?

NA has the lower trailing P/E: BHP trades at 9.85 and NA at 2.30. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, BHP or NA?

Over the past five years, NA grew revenue faster — BHP at a 3.47% CAGR versus NA at 64.16%.

Does BHP or NA pay a bigger dividend?

BHP pays a dividend (3.17% yield), while NA has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is BHP or NA more profitable?

NA runs the higher net margin — BHP at 20.10% versus NA at 505.49%.

BHP Group Limited (BHP) vs Nano Labs Ltd (NA)

A side-by-side comparison of BHP Group Limited and Nano Labs Ltd across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Different business models: BHP is classified in Basic Materials; NA is classified in Technology. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

BHP

BHP Group Limited

$212.86B

$83.79Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Nano Labs Ltd

$119M

$1.76TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — BHP vs NA

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 4y

BHP +108.4%NA -98.4%BHP compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

BHP NA

BHP vs NA: by the numbers

•BHP is the larger company ($212.86B vs $119M market cap).
•NA trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (2.30 vs 9.85 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•NA converts more revenue to profit (505.49% vs 20.10% net margin).
•NA grew revenue faster over the past five years (64.16% vs 3.47% CAGR).
•BHP pays a dividend (3.17% yield), while NA has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BHP	NA
P/E ratio	9.85	2.30
Forward P/E	16.75	N/A
P/S ratio	1.98	11.40
P/B ratio	4.24	0.41
PEG ratio	0.96	N/A
EV / EBITDA	4.30	6.44
FCF yield	9.77%	N/A

Profitability

Metric	BHP	NA
Gross margin	82.72%	-147.33%
Operating margin	41.04%	-396.84%
Net margin	20.10%	505.49%
ROE	42.93%	17.96%
ROIC	12.42%	-10.96%

Dividends

Metric	BHP	NA
Dividend yield	3.17%	N/A
Payout ratio	74.72%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BHP	NA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	3.47%	64.16%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	2.81%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	2.84%	N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)	11.57%	N/A

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, BHP or NA?: NA has the lower trailing P/E: BHP trades at 9.85 and NA at 2.30. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, BHP or NA?: Over the past five years, NA grew revenue faster — BHP at a 3.47% CAGR versus NA at 64.16%.
Does BHP or NA pay a bigger dividend?: BHP pays a dividend (3.17% yield), while NA has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is BHP or NA more profitable?: NA runs the higher net margin — BHP at 20.10% versus NA at 505.49%.

Go deeper

Full BHP analysis Full NA analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

BHP P/E ratio Nano Labs P/E ratio BHP dividend yield Nano Labs dividend yield BHP ROE Nano Labs ROE BHP operating margin Nano Labs operating margin BHP revenue growth Nano Labs revenue growth BHP free cash flow Nano Labs free cash flow

BHP & Nano Labs appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.