BHP Group Limited (BHP) vs Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX)
BHP leads on 12 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of BHP Group Limited and Freeport-McMoRan Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 28, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
BHP
BHP Group Limited
$81.02Basic Materials
FCX
Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
$62.45Basic Materials
Total return — BHP vs FCX
growth of $100 · last 30yBHP +663.6%FCX +301.3%BHP compounded faster
BHP FCX
BHP vs FCX: by the numbers
- •BHP is the larger company ($205.82B vs $89.60B market cap).
- •BHP trades at the lower earnings multiple (9.51 vs 33.04 P/E).
- •BHP converts more revenue to profit (20.10% vs 10.34% net margin).
- •FCX grew revenue faster over the past five years (11.28% vs 3.47% CAGR).
- •BHP pays the higher dividend yield (3.60% vs 0.96%).
Which is better, BHP or FCX?
Metric tally: BHP 12 · FCX 3It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueBHP(lower P/E)
GrowthFCX(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeBHP(higher dividend yield)
QualityBHP(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BHP | FCX |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 9.51● | 33.04 |
| Forward P/E | 15.64 | 15.79 |
| P/S ratio | 1.92● | 3.41 |
| P/B ratio | 4.09● | 4.62 |
| PEG ratio | 0.96● | 1.98 |
| EV / EBITDA | 4.16● | 10.03 |
| FCF yield | 10.12%● | 6.93% |
Profitability
| Metric | BHP | FCX |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 82.72%● | 27.80% |
| Operating margin | 41.04%● | 27.77% |
| Net margin | 20.10%● | 10.34% |
| ROE | 42.93%● | 14.01% |
| ROIC | 12.42%● | 7.77% |
Dividends
| Metric | BHP | FCX |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.60%● | 0.96% |
| Payout ratio | 82.02% | 39.22% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BHP | FCX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 3.47% | 11.28%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 2.81% | 30.14%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -0.18% | 20.99%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 12.20% | 12.43% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, BHP or FCX?
- It depends on your goal. value: BHP (lower P/E); growth: FCX (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: BHP (higher dividend yield); quality: BHP (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, BHP leads 12 to 3.
- Is BHP or FCX cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, BHP is cheaper: BHP trades at a 9.51 P/E and FCX at 33.04.
- Which has grown faster, BHP or FCX?
- Over the past five years, FCX grew revenue faster — BHP at a 3.47% CAGR versus FCX at 11.28%.
- Does BHP or FCX pay a bigger dividend?
- BHP yields 3.60% and FCX yields 0.96% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is BHP or FCX more profitable?
- BHP runs the higher net margin — BHP at 20.10% versus FCX at 10.34%.
- Which has been the better investment, BHP or FCX?
- Over the past 10-year, FCX delivered the higher annualized total return — BHP at 20.21% versus FCX at 20.64%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
BHP P/E ratioFreeport-McMoRan P/E ratioBHP dividend yieldFreeport-McMoRan dividend yieldBHP ROEFreeport-McMoRan ROEBHP operating marginFreeport-McMoRan operating marginBHP revenue growthFreeport-McMoRan revenue growthBHP free cash flowFreeport-McMoRan free cash flow
BHP & Freeport-McMoRan appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 28, 2026.