Brighthouse Financial, Inc. (BHFAP) vs Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAD)

Over the past 5 years, BHFAP lagged NAD — -5.42% vs -2.63% annualized total return (price plus dividends).

A side-by-side comparison of Brighthouse Financial, Inc. and Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total return — BHFAP vs NAD

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8y
BHFAP -4.8% (-0.6%/yr)NAD +13.3% (+1.6%/yr)NAD compounded faster over this window
80100120140Start $100202120232025$95$113
BHFAP NAD

Metrics side by side

Did BHFAP beat NAD?

Over the past 5 years, BHFAP lagged NAD — -5.42% vs -2.63% annualized total return (price plus dividends).

Total return (annualized)

MetricBHFAPNAD
Total return (1Y)-4.94%-8.00%
Total return CAGR (3Y)-6.56%6.77%
Total return CAGR (5Y)-5.42%-2.63%
Total return CAGR (10Y)N/A1.60%

NAD is an index fund, so valuation, profitability, and per-company growth metrics don't apply — the head-to-head here is total return (price plus reinvested dividends).

Frequently asked

Has BHFAP beaten NAD?
Over the past 5 years, BHFAP lagged NAD — -5.42% vs -2.63% annualized total return (price plus dividends).

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.