Which has the lower trailing P/E, BHF or GBDC?

BHF has the lower trailing P/E: BHF trades at 3.98 and GBDC at 22.36. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, BHF or GBDC?

Over the past five years, GBDC grew revenue faster — BHF at a -5.56% CAGR versus GBDC at 10.39%.

Does BHF or GBDC pay a bigger dividend?

GBDC pays a dividend (11.15% yield), while BHF has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is BHF or GBDC more profitable?

GBDC runs the higher net margin — BHF at 13.22% versus GBDC at 20.51%.

How have BHF and GBDC total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, BHF delivered 1.02% and GBDC delivered 5.49% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Brighthouse Financial, Inc. (BHF) vs Golub Capital BDC, Inc. (GBDC)

A side-by-side comparison of Brighthouse Financial, Inc. and Golub Capital BDC, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

BHF

Brighthouse Financial, Inc.

$2.90B

$50.42Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 10:55 AM EDT

GBDC

Golub Capital BDC, Inc.

$3.20B

$12.30Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 10:50 AM EDT

Total return — BHF vs GBDC

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 9y

BHF -28.8% (-3.7%/yr)GBDC +48.2% (+4.5%/yr)GBDC compounded faster over this window

BHF GBDC

BHF vs GBDC: by the numbers

•GBDC is the larger company ($3.20B vs $2.90B market cap).
•BHF trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (3.98 vs 22.36 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•GBDC converts more revenue to profit (20.51% vs 13.22% net margin).
•GBDC grew revenue faster over the past five years (10.39% vs -5.56% CAGR).
•GBDC pays a dividend (11.15% yield), while BHF has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BHF	GBDC
P/E ratio	3.98	22.36
Forward P/E	2.55	9.62
PEG ratio	N/A	0.72
P/S ratio	0.46	4.48
P/B ratio	0.44	0.86

Profitability

Metric	BHF	GBDC
Gross margin	N/A	74.39%
Operating margin	15.52%	78.94%
Net margin	13.22%	20.51%
ROE	12.69%	3.96%

Brighthouse Financial, Inc.: Gross margin is not shown for a lender or insurer: its revenue is interest, premiums and fees rather than the sale of goods, so there is no cost of goods sold to measure it against.

Dividends

Metric	BHF	GBDC
Dividend yield	N/A	11.15%
Payout ratio	N/A	250.91%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BHF	GBDC
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-5.56%	10.39%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	30.87%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	1.02%	5.49%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, BHF or GBDC?: BHF has the lower trailing P/E: BHF trades at 3.98 and GBDC at 22.36. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, BHF or GBDC?: Over the past five years, GBDC grew revenue faster — BHF at a -5.56% CAGR versus GBDC at 10.39%.
Does BHF or GBDC pay a bigger dividend?: GBDC pays a dividend (11.15% yield), while BHF has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is BHF or GBDC more profitable?: GBDC runs the higher net margin — BHF at 13.22% versus GBDC at 20.51%.
How have BHF and GBDC total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, BHF delivered 1.02% and GBDC delivered 5.49% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full BHF analysis Full GBDC analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Brighthouse Financial P/E ratio Golub Capital BDC P/E ratio Golub Capital BDC dividend yield Brighthouse Financial ROE Golub Capital BDC ROE Brighthouse Financial operating margin Golub Capital BDC operating margin Brighthouse Financial revenue growth Golub Capital BDC revenue growth

Brighthouse Financial & Golub Capital BDC appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.