BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) vs Public Storage (PSA)

A side-by-side comparison of BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust and Public Storage across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare
Different business models: BGT is classified in Financial Services; PSA is classified in Real Estate. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

Total returnBGT vs PSA

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y
BGT +91.3% (+6.7%/yr)PSA +94.9% (+6.9%/yr)PSA compounded faster over this window
100150200Start $10020182020202220242026$191$195
BGT PSA

BGT vs PSA: by the numbers

  • PSA is the larger company ($55.29B vs $328M market cap).
  • BGT converts more revenue to profit (73.11% vs 41.80% net margin).
  • PSA grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.62% vs 1.46% CAGR).
  • BGT pays the higher dividend yield (13.17% vs 4.07%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricBGTPSA
P/E ratioN/A28.29
Forward P/EN/A29.57
P/S ratioN/A11.31
P/B ratio0.996.02
EV / EBITDAN/A18.49
FCF yieldN/A5.10%

For REITs like Public Storage, GAAP P/E is distorted: heavy non-cash property depreciation depresses reported earnings and overstates the multiple. Real-estate companies are valued on funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) and price-to-FFO — see the Funds From Operations section. The P/E is shown for reference only.

Profitability

MetricBGTPSA
Gross margin84.12%24.96%
Operating margin90.60%48.30%
Net margin73.11%41.80%
ROE7.53%22.24%
ROICN/A11.74%

Dividends

MetricBGTPSA
Dividend yield13.17%4.07%
Payout ratioN/A114.50%

Public Storage's payout ratio is measured against GAAP earnings, which non-cash depreciation depresses for REITs — the dividend is conventionally assessed against funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) instead, so the GAAP figure overstates the payout burden.

Growth (annualized)

MetricBGTPSA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)1.46%9.62%
EPS CAGR (5Y)43.50%7.52%
FCF CAGR (5Y)N/A9.64%
Total return CAGR (5Y)6.66%1.70%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, BGT or PSA?
Over the past five years, PSA grew revenue faster — BGT at a 1.46% CAGR versus PSA at 9.62%.
Does BGT or PSA pay a bigger dividend?
BGT yields 13.17% and PSA yields 4.07% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is BGT or PSA more profitable?
BGT runs the higher net margin — BGT at 73.11% versus PSA at 41.80%.
How have BGT and PSA total returns compared?
Over the past 10 years, BGT delivered 6.61% and PSA delivered 6.81% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 10, 2026.