BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) vs PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund (PCQ)
Over the past 10 years, PCQ lagged BGT — -2.80% vs 5.96% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
A side-by-side comparison of BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust and PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 2, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Total return — BGT vs PCQ
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yMetrics side by side
Did PCQ beat BGT?
Over the past 10 years, PCQ lagged BGT — -2.80% vs 5.96% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Total return (annualized)
| Metric | BGT | PCQ |
|---|---|---|
| Total return (1Y) | -2.24% | -7.74% |
| Total return CAGR (3Y) | 7.32% | 2.33% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 5.89% | -12.17% |
| Total return CAGR (10Y) | 5.96% | -2.80% |
BGT is an index fund, so valuation, profitability, and per-company growth metrics don't apply — the head-to-head here is total return (price plus reinvested dividends).
Frequently asked
- Has PCQ beaten BGT?
- Over the past 10 years, PCQ lagged BGT — -2.80% vs 5.96% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 2, 2026.