BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) vs Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund (NMS)
BGT leads on 11 of 13 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust and Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 29, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
BGT
BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust
$10.52Financial Services
NMS
Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund
$12.00Financial Services
Total return — BGT vs NMS
growth of $100 · last 12yBGT -24.2%NMS -20.0%NMS compounded faster
BGT NMS
BGT vs NMS: by the numbers
- •BGT is the larger company ($314M vs $75M market cap).
- •BGT trades at the lower earnings multiple (9.65 vs 11.21 P/E).
- •NMS converts more revenue to profit (87.52% vs 71.60% net margin).
- •BGT grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.30% vs -7.24% CAGR).
- •BGT pays the higher dividend yield (13.72% vs 6.30%).
Which is better, BGT or NMS?
Metric tally: BGT 11 · NMS 2It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueBGT(lower P/E)
GrowthBGT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeBGT(higher dividend yield)
QualityBGT(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BGT | NMS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 9.65● | 11.21 |
| P/S ratio | 7.35● | 9.91 |
| P/B ratio | 0.80● | 1.00 |
| PEG ratio | 0.22● | 2.28 |
Profitability
| Metric | BGT | NMS |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 84.12%● | -4.36% |
| Operating margin | 87.84%● | -12.54% |
| Net margin | 71.60% | 87.52%● |
| ROE | 7.75% | 8.85%● |
| ROIC | 4.57%● | -0.21% |
Dividends
| Metric | BGT | NMS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 13.72%● | 6.30% |
| Payout ratio | 197.72% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BGT | NMS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.30%● | -7.24% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 43.50%● | -22.02% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 6.36%● | -0.65% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, BGT or NMS?
- It depends on your goal. value: BGT (lower P/E); growth: BGT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: BGT (higher dividend yield); quality: BGT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, BGT leads 11 to 2.
- Is BGT or NMS cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, BGT is cheaper: BGT trades at a 9.65 P/E and NMS at 11.21.
- Which has grown faster, BGT or NMS?
- Over the past five years, BGT grew revenue faster — BGT at a 9.30% CAGR versus NMS at -7.24%.
- Does BGT or NMS pay a bigger dividend?
- BGT yields 13.72% and NMS yields 6.30% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is BGT or NMS more profitable?
- NMS runs the higher net margin — BGT at 71.60% versus NMS at 87.52%.
- Which has been the better investment, BGT or NMS?
- Over the past 10-year, BGT delivered the higher annualized total return — BGT at 6.31% versus NMS at 1.71%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
BlackRock Floating Rate Income P/E ratioNuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund P/E ratioBlackRock Floating Rate Income dividend yieldNuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund dividend yieldBlackRock Floating Rate Income ROENuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund ROEBlackRock Floating Rate Income operating marginNuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund operating marginBlackRock Floating Rate Income revenue growthNuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund revenue growthBlackRock Floating Rate Income free cash flowNuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund free cash flow
BlackRock Floating Rate Income & Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 29, 2026.