BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) vs Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund (NMS)
A side-by-side comparison of BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust and Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
BGT
BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust
$11.06Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Aug 12, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
NMS
Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund
$11.55Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Aug 12, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — BGT vs NMS
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yBGT +91.0% (+6.7%/yr)NMS +9.4% (+0.9%/yr)BGT compounded faster over this window
BGT NMS
BGT vs NMS: by the numbers
- •BGT is the larger company ($330M vs $74M market cap).
- •BGT trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (10.15 vs 10.79 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •NMS converts more revenue to profit (130.68% vs 73.11% net margin).
- •NMS grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.23% vs 1.46% CAGR).
- •BGT pays the higher dividend yield (13.05% vs 6.91%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BGT | NMS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 10.15 | 10.79 |
| P/S ratio | 7.73 | 9.54 |
| P/B ratio | 0.84 | 0.88 |
Profitability
| Metric | BGT | NMS |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 84.12% | 85.04% |
| Operating margin | 90.60% | 162.66% |
| Net margin | 73.11% | 130.68% |
| ROE | 7.09% | -0.33% |
| ROIC | 4.57% | 7.04% |
Dividends
| Metric | BGT | NMS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 13.05% | 6.91% |
| Payout ratio | 197.72% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BGT | NMS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 1.46% | 9.23% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 43.50% | -22.02% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 6.93% | -0.84% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, BGT or NMS?
- BGT has the lower trailing P/E: BGT trades at 10.15 and NMS at 10.79. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, BGT or NMS?
- Over the past five years, NMS grew revenue faster — BGT at a 1.46% CAGR versus NMS at 9.23%.
- Does BGT or NMS pay a bigger dividend?
- BGT yields 13.05% and NMS yields 6.91% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is BGT or NMS more profitable?
- NMS runs the higher net margin — BGT at 73.11% versus NMS at 130.68%.
- How have BGT and NMS total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, BGT delivered 6.69% and NMS delivered 0.91% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
BlackRock Floating Rate Income P/E ratioNuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund P/E ratioBlackRock Floating Rate Income dividend yieldNuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund dividend yieldBlackRock Floating Rate Income ROENuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund ROEBlackRock Floating Rate Income operating marginNuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund operating marginBlackRock Floating Rate Income revenue growthNuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund revenue growth
BlackRock Floating Rate Income & Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 13, 2026.