BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) vs Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAD)
BGT leads on 7 of 12 compared metrics, though NAD is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust and Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 26, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
BGT
BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust
$10.60Financial Services
NAD
Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund
$12.04Financial Services
Total return — BGT vs NAD
growth of $100 · last 22yBGT -47.3%NAD -20.4%NAD compounded faster
BGT NAD
BGT vs NAD: by the numbers
- •NAD is the larger company ($2.81B vs $314M market cap).
- •NAD trades at the lower earnings multiple (4.87 vs 9.72 P/E).
- •NAD converts more revenue to profit (140.28% vs 71.60% net margin).
- •BGT grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.30% vs -0.50% CAGR).
- •BGT pays the higher dividend yield (13.62% vs 7.03%).
Which is better, BGT or NAD?
Metric tally: BGT 7 · NAD 5It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueNAD(lower P/E)
GrowthBGT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeBGT(higher dividend yield)
QualityBGT(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BGT | NAD |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 9.72 | 4.87● |
| P/S ratio | 7.41 | 6.85● |
| P/B ratio | 0.80● | 0.98 |
| PEG ratio | 0.22 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | BGT | NAD |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 84.12% | 93.93%● |
| Operating margin | 87.84%● | 69.73% |
| Net margin | 71.60% | 140.28%● |
| ROE | 7.75% | 20.16%● |
| ROIC | 4.57%● | 2.93% |
Dividends
| Metric | BGT | NAD |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 13.62%● | 7.03% |
| Payout ratio | 197.72% | 302.14% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BGT | NAD |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.30%● | -0.50% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 43.50%● | -10.59% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 6.40%● | 0.36% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, BGT or NAD?
- It depends on your goal. value: NAD (lower P/E); growth: BGT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: BGT (higher dividend yield); quality: BGT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, BGT leads 7 to 5.
- Is BGT or NAD cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, NAD is cheaper: BGT trades at a 9.72 P/E and NAD at 4.87.
- Which has grown faster, BGT or NAD?
- Over the past five years, BGT grew revenue faster — BGT at a 9.30% CAGR versus NAD at -0.50%.
- Does BGT or NAD pay a bigger dividend?
- BGT yields 13.62% and NAD yields 7.03% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is BGT or NAD more profitable?
- NAD runs the higher net margin — BGT at 71.60% versus NAD at 140.28%.
- Which has been the better investment, BGT or NAD?
- Over the past 10-year, BGT delivered the higher annualized total return — BGT at 6.33% versus NAD at 2.90%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
BlackRock Floating Rate Income P/E ratioNuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund P/E ratioBlackRock Floating Rate Income dividend yieldNuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund dividend yieldBlackRock Floating Rate Income ROENuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund ROEBlackRock Floating Rate Income operating marginNuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund operating marginBlackRock Floating Rate Income revenue growthNuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund revenue growthBlackRock Floating Rate Income free cash flowNuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund free cash flow
BlackRock Floating Rate Income & Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 26, 2026.