BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) vs Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB)
A side-by-side comparison of BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust and Kimberly-Clark Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 1, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: BGT is classified in Financial Services; KMB is classified in Consumer Defensive. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
BGT
BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust
$10.83Financial ServicesAt close: Jul 31, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
$109.31Consumer DefensiveAt close: Jul 31, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Total return — BGT vs KMB
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 22yBGT +191.9%KMB +289.0%KMB compounded faster
BGT KMB
BGT vs KMB: by the numbers
- •KMB is the larger company ($36.28B vs $323M market cap).
- •BGT trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (9.94 vs 17.16 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •BGT converts more revenue to profit (71.60% vs 12.81% net margin).
- •BGT grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.30% vs -2.61% CAGR).
- •BGT pays the higher dividend yield (13.33% vs 4.65%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BGT | KMB |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 9.94 | 17.16 |
| Forward P/E | N/A | 14.53 |
| P/S ratio | 7.57 | 2.20 |
| P/B ratio | 0.82 | 20.28 |
| PEG ratio | 0.23 | N/A |
| EV / EBITDA | N/A | 15.13 |
| FCF yield | N/A | 7.08% |
Profitability
| Metric | BGT | KMB |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 84.12% | 35.86% |
| Operating margin | 87.84% | 13.27% |
| Net margin | 71.60% | 12.81% |
| ROE | 7.75% | 117.98% |
| ROIC | 4.57% | 17.41% |
Dividends
| Metric | BGT | KMB |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 13.33% | 4.65% |
| Payout ratio | 197.72% | 83.55% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BGT | KMB |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.30% | -2.61% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 43.50% | -2.50% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | N/A | -8.19% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 6.81% | -0.52% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, BGT or KMB?
- BGT has the lower trailing P/E: BGT trades at 9.94 and KMB at 17.16. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, BGT or KMB?
- Over the past five years, BGT grew revenue faster — BGT at a 9.30% CAGR versus KMB at -2.61%.
- Does BGT or KMB pay a bigger dividend?
- BGT yields 13.33% and KMB yields 4.65% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is BGT or KMB more profitable?
- BGT runs the higher net margin — BGT at 71.60% versus KMB at 12.81%.
- How have BGT and KMB total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, BGT delivered 6.51% and KMB delivered 1.83% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
BlackRock Floating Rate Income P/E ratioKimberly-Clark P/E ratioBlackRock Floating Rate Income dividend yieldKimberly-Clark dividend yieldBlackRock Floating Rate Income ROEKimberly-Clark ROEBlackRock Floating Rate Income operating marginKimberly-Clark operating marginBlackRock Floating Rate Income revenue growthKimberly-Clark revenue growthBlackRock Floating Rate Income free cash flowKimberly-Clark free cash flow
BlackRock Floating Rate Income & Kimberly-Clark appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 1, 2026.