BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) vs The New Germany Fund, Inc. (GF)
BGT leads on 8 of 13 compared metrics, though GF is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust and The New Germany Fund, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
BGT
BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust
$10.59Financial Services
GF
The New Germany Fund, Inc.
$11.65Financial Services
Total return — BGT vs GF
growth of $100 · last 22yBGT -46.9%GF +58.9%GF compounded faster
BGT GF
BGT vs GF: by the numbers
- •BGT is the larger company ($317M vs $189M market cap).
- •GF trades at the lower earnings multiple (5.32 vs 9.72 P/E).
- •GF converts more revenue to profit (286.83% vs 71.60% net margin).
- •BGT grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.30% vs -3.04% CAGR).
- •BGT pays the higher dividend yield (13.63% vs 2.44%).
Which is better, BGT or GF?
Metric tally: BGT 8 · GF 5It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueGF(lower P/E)
GrowthBGT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeBGT(higher dividend yield)
QualityGF(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BGT | GF |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 9.72 | 5.32● |
| Forward P/E | — | 5.14 |
| P/S ratio | 7.40● | 15.30 |
| P/B ratio | 0.80● | 0.92 |
| PEG ratio | 0.22 | 0.02● |
Profitability
| Metric | BGT | GF |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 96.00%● | 85.03% |
| Operating margin | 87.84%● | -98.27% |
| Net margin | 71.60% | 286.83%● |
| ROE | 7.75% | 17.19%● |
| ROIC | 4.57% | 26.89%● |
Dividends
| Metric | BGT | GF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 13.63%● | 2.44% |
| Payout ratio | 197.72% | 8.27% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BGT | GF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.30%● | -3.04% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 43.50%● | -11.39% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 6.55%● | -8.37% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, BGT or GF?
- It depends on your goal. value: GF (lower P/E); growth: BGT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: BGT (higher dividend yield); quality: GF (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, BGT leads 8 to 5.
- Is BGT or GF cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, GF is cheaper: BGT trades at a 9.72 P/E and GF at 5.32.
- Which has grown faster, BGT or GF?
- Over the past five years, BGT grew revenue faster — BGT at a 9.30% CAGR versus GF at -3.04%.
- Does BGT or GF pay a bigger dividend?
- BGT yields 13.63% and GF yields 2.44% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is BGT or GF more profitable?
- GF runs the higher net margin — BGT at 71.60% versus GF at 286.83%.
- Which has been the better investment, BGT or GF?
- Over the past 10-year, BGT delivered the higher annualized total return — BGT at 6.41% versus GF at 6.01%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
BlackRock Floating Rate Income P/E ratioNew Germany Fund P/E ratioBlackRock Floating Rate Income dividend yieldNew Germany Fund dividend yieldBlackRock Floating Rate Income ROENew Germany Fund ROEBlackRock Floating Rate Income operating marginNew Germany Fund operating marginBlackRock Floating Rate Income revenue growthNew Germany Fund revenue growthBlackRock Floating Rate Income free cash flowNew Germany Fund free cash flow
BlackRock Floating Rate Income & New Germany Fund appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 25, 2026.