Which has the lower trailing P/E, BGT or FT?

FT has the lower trailing P/E: BGT trades at 9.99 and FT at 2.92. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, BGT or FT?

Over the past five years, BGT grew revenue faster — BGT at a 9.30% CAGR versus FT at 3.92%.

Does BGT or FT pay a bigger dividend?

BGT yields 13.25% and FT yields 6.51% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is BGT or FT more profitable?

FT runs the higher net margin — BGT at 71.60% versus FT at 179.50%.

How have BGT and FT total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, BGT delivered 6.53% and FT delivered 7.98% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) vs Franklin Universal Trust (FT)

A side-by-side comparison of BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust and Franklin Universal Trust across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 8, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

BGT

BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust

$325M

$10.89Financial ServicesAt close: Aug 7, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Franklin Universal Trust

$197M

$7.83Financial ServicesAt close: Aug 7, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Total return — BGT vs FT

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 22y

BGT +193.5%FT +532.8%FT compounded faster

BGT FT

BGT vs FT: by the numbers

•BGT is the larger company ($325M vs $197M market cap).
•FT trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (2.92 vs 9.99 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•FT converts more revenue to profit (179.50% vs 71.60% net margin).
•BGT grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.30% vs 3.92% CAGR).
•BGT pays the higher dividend yield (13.25% vs 6.51%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BGT	FT
P/E ratio	9.99	2.92
P/S ratio	7.61	5.27
P/B ratio	0.82	0.86
PEG ratio	0.23	N/A

Profitability

Metric	BGT	FT
Gross margin	84.12%	86.88%
Operating margin	87.84%	119.92%
Net margin	71.60%	179.50%
ROE	7.75%	29.45%
ROIC	4.57%	8.38%

Dividends

Metric	BGT	FT
Dividend yield	13.25%	6.51%
Payout ratio	197.72%	67.11%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BGT	FT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.30%	3.92%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	43.50%	N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)	6.76%	5.76%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, BGT or FT?: FT has the lower trailing P/E: BGT trades at 9.99 and FT at 2.92. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, BGT or FT?: Over the past five years, BGT grew revenue faster — BGT at a 9.30% CAGR versus FT at 3.92%.
Does BGT or FT pay a bigger dividend?: BGT yields 13.25% and FT yields 6.51% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is BGT or FT more profitable?: FT runs the higher net margin — BGT at 71.60% versus FT at 179.50%.
How have BGT and FT total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, BGT delivered 6.53% and FT delivered 7.98% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full BGT analysis Full FT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

BlackRock Floating Rate Income P/E ratio Franklin Universal P/E ratio BlackRock Floating Rate Income dividend yield Franklin Universal dividend yield BlackRock Floating Rate Income ROE Franklin Universal ROE BlackRock Floating Rate Income operating margin Franklin Universal operating margin BlackRock Floating Rate Income revenue growth Franklin Universal revenue growth BlackRock Floating Rate Income free cash flow Franklin Universal free cash flow

BlackRock Floating Rate Income & Franklin Universal appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 8, 2026.