BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) vs Franklin Universal Trust (FT)
FT leads on 7 of 12 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust and Franklin Universal Trust across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 24, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
BGT
BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust
$10.59Financial Services
FT
Franklin Universal Trust
$7.99Financial Services
Total return — BGT vs FT
growth of $100 · last 22yBGT -47.1%FT +43.2%FT compounded faster
BGT FT
BGT vs FT: by the numbers
- •BGT is the larger company ($316M vs $201M market cap).
- •FT trades at the lower earnings multiple (2.98 vs 9.72 P/E).
- •FT converts more revenue to profit (179.50% vs 71.60% net margin).
- •BGT grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.30% vs 3.92% CAGR).
- •BGT pays the higher dividend yield (13.63% vs 6.38%).
Which is better, BGT or FT?
Metric tally: BGT 5 · FT 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueFT(lower P/E)
GrowthBGT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeBGT(higher dividend yield)
QualityFT(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BGT | FT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 9.72 | 2.98● |
| P/S ratio | 7.40 | 5.37● |
| P/B ratio | 0.80● | 0.88 |
| PEG ratio | 0.22 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | BGT | FT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 96.00%● | 86.88% |
| Operating margin | 87.84% | 198.87%● |
| Net margin | 71.60% | 179.50%● |
| ROE | 7.75% | 29.45%● |
| ROIC | 4.57% | 8.38%● |
Dividends
| Metric | BGT | FT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 13.63%● | 6.38% |
| Payout ratio | 197.72% | 67.11% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BGT | FT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.30%● | 3.92% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 43.50%● | -3.82% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 6.38% | 7.02%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, BGT or FT?
- It depends on your goal. value: FT (lower P/E); growth: BGT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: BGT (higher dividend yield); quality: FT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, FT leads 7 to 5.
- Is BGT or FT cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, FT is cheaper: BGT trades at a 9.72 P/E and FT at 2.98.
- Which has grown faster, BGT or FT?
- Over the past five years, BGT grew revenue faster — BGT at a 9.30% CAGR versus FT at 3.92%.
- Does BGT or FT pay a bigger dividend?
- BGT yields 13.63% and FT yields 6.38% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is BGT or FT more profitable?
- FT runs the higher net margin — BGT at 71.60% versus FT at 179.50%.
- Which has been the better investment, BGT or FT?
- Over the past 10-year, FT delivered the higher annualized total return — BGT at 6.39% versus FT at 8.35%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
BlackRock Floating Rate Income P/E ratioFranklin Universal P/E ratioBlackRock Floating Rate Income dividend yieldFranklin Universal dividend yieldBlackRock Floating Rate Income ROEFranklin Universal ROEBlackRock Floating Rate Income operating marginFranklin Universal operating marginBlackRock Floating Rate Income revenue growthFranklin Universal revenue growthBlackRock Floating Rate Income free cash flowFranklin Universal free cash flow
BlackRock Floating Rate Income & Franklin Universal appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 24, 2026.