BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) vs Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG)
A side-by-side comparison of BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust and Conagra Brands, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 1, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: BGT is classified in Financial Services; CAG is classified in Consumer Defensive. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
BGT
BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust
$10.83Financial ServicesAt close: Jul 31, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
CAG
Conagra Brands, Inc.
$14.51Consumer DefensiveAt close: Jul 31, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Total return — BGT vs CAG
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 22yBGT +191.9%CAG +61.4%BGT compounded faster
BGT CAG
BGT vs CAG: by the numbers
- •CAG is the larger company ($6.94B vs $323M market cap).
- •BGT is profitable (71.60% net margin) while CAG runs a net loss (-16.99%).
- •BGT grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.30% vs -0.55% CAGR).
- •BGT pays the higher dividend yield (13.33% vs 9.65%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BGT | CAG |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 9.94 | N/A |
| Forward P/E | N/A | 8.56 |
| P/S ratio | 7.57 | 0.62 |
| P/B ratio | 0.82 | 1.09 |
| PEG ratio | 0.23 | N/A |
| EV / EBITDA | N/A | 7.53 |
| FCF yield | N/A | 14.08% |
Profitability
| Metric | BGT | CAG |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 84.12% | 23.92% |
| Operating margin | 87.84% | -14.43% |
| Net margin | 71.60% | -16.99% |
| ROE | 7.75% | -30.14% |
| ROIC | 4.57% | -10.93% |
Dividends
| Metric | BGT | CAG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 13.33% | 9.65% |
| Payout ratio | 197.72% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BGT | CAG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.30% | -0.55% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 43.50% | N/A |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 0.35% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 6.81% | -10.81% |
Frequently asked
- Which has grown faster, BGT or CAG?
- Over the past five years, BGT grew revenue faster — BGT at a 9.30% CAGR versus CAG at -0.55%.
- Does BGT or CAG pay a bigger dividend?
- BGT yields 13.33% and CAG yields 9.65% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is BGT or CAG more profitable?
- BGT runs the higher net margin — BGT at 71.60% versus CAG at -16.99%.
- How have BGT and CAG total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, BGT delivered 6.51% and CAG delivered -5.12% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
BlackRock Floating Rate Income P/E ratioConagra Brands P/E ratioBlackRock Floating Rate Income dividend yieldConagra Brands dividend yieldBlackRock Floating Rate Income ROEConagra Brands ROEBlackRock Floating Rate Income operating marginConagra Brands operating marginBlackRock Floating Rate Income revenue growthConagra Brands revenue growthBlackRock Floating Rate Income free cash flowConagra Brands free cash flow
BlackRock Floating Rate Income & Conagra Brands appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 1, 2026.