BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) vs Blackrock 2037 Municipal Target Term Trust (BMN)
Over the past 3 years, BGT outperformed BMN — 10.29% vs 6.03% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
A side-by-side comparison of BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust and Blackrock 2037 Municipal Target Term Trust across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 20, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — BGT vs BMN
growth of $100 · last 4yMetrics side by side
Did BGT beat BMN?
Over the past 3 years, BGT outperformed BMN — 10.29% vs 6.03% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Total return (annualized)
| Metric | BGT | BMN |
|---|---|---|
| Total return (1Y) | -1.78% | 9.35%● |
| Total return CAGR (3Y) | 10.29%● | 6.03% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 6.61% | — |
| Total return CAGR (10Y) | 6.43% | — |
BMN is an index fund, so valuation, profitability, and per-company growth metrics don't apply — the head-to-head here is total return (price plus reinvested dividends).
Frequently asked
- Has BGT beaten BMN?
- Over the past 3 years, BGT outperformed BMN — 10.29% vs 6.03% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 20, 2026.