Bunge Global S.A. (BG) vs Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ)
STZ leads on 12 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Bunge Global S.A. and Constellation Brands, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 21, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
BG
Bunge Global S.A.
$112.58Consumer Defensive
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
$141.18Consumer Defensive
Total return — BG vs STZ
growth of $100 · last 25yBG +603.6%STZ +1187.0%STZ compounded faster
BG STZ
BG vs STZ: by the numbers
- •STZ is the larger company ($24.22B vs $21.84B market cap).
- •STZ trades at the lower earnings multiple (14.72 vs 26.18 P/E).
- •STZ converts more revenue to profit (18.46% vs 0.85% net margin).
- •BG grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.25% vs 1.19% CAGR).
- •STZ pays the higher dividend yield (2.90% vs 2.50%).
Which is better, BG or STZ?
Metric tally: BG 4 · STZ 12It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueSTZ(lower P/E)
GrowthBG(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeSTZ(higher dividend yield)
QualitySTZ(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BG | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 26.18 | 14.72● |
| Forward P/E | 12.00 | 11.37● |
| P/S ratio | 0.27● | 2.68 |
| P/B ratio | 1.37● | 3.03 |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.90 | 11.29● |
| FCF yield | 0.06% | 7.32%● |
Profitability
| Metric | BG | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 5.22% | 51.67%● |
| Operating margin | 2.41% | 31.33%● |
| Net margin | 0.85% | 18.46%● |
| ROE | 4.28% | 20.87%● |
| ROIC | 2.24% | 10.48%● |
Dividends
| Metric | BG | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.50% | 2.90%● |
| Payout ratio | 56.85% | 42.52% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BG | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 12.25%● | 1.19% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -9.16% | -1.59%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -30.92% | -1.57%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 10.78%● | -6.95% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, BG or STZ?
- It depends on your goal. value: STZ (lower P/E); growth: BG (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: STZ (higher dividend yield); quality: STZ (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, STZ leads 12 to 4.
- Is BG or STZ cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, STZ is cheaper: BG trades at a 26.18 P/E and STZ at 14.72.
- Which has grown faster, BG or STZ?
- Over the past five years, BG grew revenue faster — BG at a 12.25% CAGR versus STZ at 1.19%.
- Does BG or STZ pay a bigger dividend?
- BG yields 2.50% and STZ yields 2.90% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is BG or STZ more profitable?
- STZ runs the higher net margin — BG at 0.85% versus STZ at 18.46%.
- Which has been the better investment, BG or STZ?
- Over the past 10-year, BG delivered the higher annualized total return — BG at 9.38% versus STZ at 0.69%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Bunge Global P/E ratioConstellation Brands P/E ratioBunge Global dividend yieldConstellation Brands dividend yieldBunge Global ROEConstellation Brands ROEBunge Global operating marginConstellation Brands operating marginBunge Global revenue growthConstellation Brands revenue growthBunge Global free cash flowConstellation Brands free cash flow
Bunge Global & Constellation Brands appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 21, 2026.