Which has grown faster, BEP or SMR?

Over the past five years, SMR grew revenue faster — BEP at a 10.94% CAGR versus SMR at 120.81%.

Does BEP or SMR pay a bigger dividend?

BEP pays a dividend (4.33% yield) while SMR does not currently pay one.

Is BEP or SMR more profitable?

BEP runs the higher net margin — BEP at 3.01% versus SMR at -2066.55%.

Which has been the better investment, BEP or SMR?

Over the past 5-year, BEP delivered the higher annualized total return — BEP at 14.30% versus SMR at 0.40%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP) vs NuScale Power Corporation (SMR)

BEP leads on 7 of 9 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. and NuScale Power Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

BEP

Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.

$10.71B

$35.32Utilities

SMR

NuScale Power Corporation

$3.04B

$10.21Utilities

Total return — BEP vs SMR

growth of $100 · last 6y

BEP -7.0%SMR +2.6%SMR compounded faster

BEP SMR

BEP vs SMR: by the numbers

•BEP is the larger company ($10.71B vs $3.04B market cap).
•BEP is profitable (3.01% net margin) while SMR runs a net loss (-2066.55%).
•SMR grew revenue faster over the past five years (120.81% vs 10.94% CAGR).
•BEP pays a dividend (4.33% yield) while SMR does not currently pay one.

Which is better, BEP or SMR?

Metric tally: BEP 7 · SMR 2

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthSMR(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityBEP(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BEP	SMR
P/E ratio	58.87	—
P/S ratio	1.68●	89.54
P/B ratio	2.54	1.43●
PEG ratio	4.33	—
EV / EBITDA	9.27	—

Profitability

Metric	BEP	SMR
Gross margin	34.36%●	22.42%
Operating margin	11.33%●	-3812.57%
Net margin	3.01%●	-2066.55%
ROE	4.56%●	-33.06%
ROIC	1.03%●	-61.76%

Dividends

Metric	BEP	SMR
Dividend yield	4.33%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BEP	SMR
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	10.94%	120.81%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-20.67%	—
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-7.80%	—
Total return CAGR (5Y)	4.05%●	0.40%

Frequently asked

Which is better, BEP or SMR?: It depends on your goal. growth: SMR (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: BEP (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, BEP leads 7 to 2.
Which has grown faster, BEP or SMR?: Over the past five years, SMR grew revenue faster — BEP at a 10.94% CAGR versus SMR at 120.81%.
Does BEP or SMR pay a bigger dividend?: BEP pays a dividend (4.33% yield) while SMR does not currently pay one.
Is BEP or SMR more profitable?: BEP runs the higher net margin — BEP at 3.01% versus SMR at -2066.55%.
Which has been the better investment, BEP or SMR?: Over the past 5-year, BEP delivered the higher annualized total return — BEP at 14.30% versus SMR at 0.40%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full BEP analysis Full SMR analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. P/E ratio NuScale Power P/E ratio Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. dividend yield NuScale Power dividend yield Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. ROE NuScale Power ROE Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. operating margin NuScale Power operating margin Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. revenue growth NuScale Power revenue growth Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. free cash flow NuScale Power free cash flow

Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. & NuScale Power appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 25, 2026.