Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP) vs Northwest Natural Holding Company (NWN)
NWN leads on 11 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. and Northwest Natural Holding Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 29, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
BEP
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.
$35.27Utilities
NWN
Northwest Natural Holding Company
$50.83Utilities
Total return — BEP vs NWN
growth of $100 · last 23yBEP +18.1%NWN +73.2%NWN compounded faster
BEP NWN
BEP vs NWN: by the numbers
- •BEP is the larger company ($10.70B vs $2.14B market cap).
- •NWN trades at the lower earnings multiple (17.07 vs 58.78 P/E).
- •NWN converts more revenue to profit (9.56% vs 3.01% net margin).
- •BEP grew revenue faster over the past five years (10.94% vs 9.83% CAGR).
- •BEP pays the higher dividend yield (4.45% vs 3.88%).
Which is better, BEP or NWN?
Metric tally: BEP 4 · NWN 11It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueNWN(lower P/E)
GrowthBEP(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeBEP(higher dividend yield)
QualityNWN(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BEP | NWN |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 58.78 | 17.07● |
| Forward P/E | — | 15.74 |
| P/S ratio | 1.68 | 1.62● |
| P/B ratio | 2.54 | 1.32● |
| PEG ratio | 4.33 | 0.46● |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.45 | 7.76● |
Profitability
| Metric | BEP | NWN |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 16.84% | 42.26%● |
| Operating margin | 11.33% | 31.35%● |
| Net margin | 3.01% | 9.56%● |
| ROE | 4.56% | 7.79%● |
| ROIC | 1.03% | 5.17%● |
Dividends
| Metric | BEP | NWN |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 4.45%● | 3.88% |
| Payout ratio | — | 71.12% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BEP | NWN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 10.94%● | 9.83% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -20.67% | 3.61%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -7.80%● | -24.53% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 3.75%● | 3.48% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, BEP or NWN?
- It depends on your goal. value: NWN (lower P/E); growth: BEP (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: BEP (higher dividend yield); quality: NWN (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, NWN leads 11 to 4.
- Is BEP or NWN cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, NWN is cheaper: BEP trades at a 58.78 P/E and NWN at 17.07.
- Which has grown faster, BEP or NWN?
- Over the past five years, BEP grew revenue faster — BEP at a 10.94% CAGR versus NWN at 9.83%.
- Does BEP or NWN pay a bigger dividend?
- BEP yields 4.45% and NWN yields 3.88% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is BEP or NWN more profitable?
- NWN runs the higher net margin — BEP at 3.01% versus NWN at 9.56%.
- Which has been the better investment, BEP or NWN?
- Over the past 10-year, BEP delivered the higher annualized total return — BEP at 14.28% versus NWN at 1.82%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. P/E ratioNorthwest Natural P/E ratioBrookfield Renewable Partners L.P. dividend yieldNorthwest Natural dividend yieldBrookfield Renewable Partners L.P. ROENorthwest Natural ROEBrookfield Renewable Partners L.P. operating marginNorthwest Natural operating marginBrookfield Renewable Partners L.P. revenue growthNorthwest Natural revenue growthBrookfield Renewable Partners L.P. free cash flowNorthwest Natural free cash flow
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. & Northwest Natural appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 29, 2026.