Franklin Resources, Inc. (BEN) vs Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company (WTW)
BEN and WTW are evenly matched — 7 metrics each of 14.
A side-by-side comparison of Franklin Resources, Inc. and Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 18, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
BEN
Franklin Resources, Inc.
$33.05Financial Services
WTW
Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company
$255.20Financial Services
Total return — BEN vs WTW
growth of $100 · last 25yBEN +128.2%WTW +480.4%WTW compounded faster
BEN WTW
BEN vs WTW: by the numbers
- •WTW is the larger company ($24.10B vs $17.17B market cap).
- •WTW trades at the lower earnings multiple (14.89 vs 24.66 P/E).
- •WTW converts more revenue to profit (16.84% vs 8.99% net margin).
- •BEN grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.65% vs 1.91% CAGR).
- •BEN pays the higher dividend yield (3.93% vs 1.46%).
Which is better, BEN or WTW?
Metric tally: BEN 7 · WTW 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueWTW(lower P/E)
GrowthBEN(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeBEN(higher dividend yield)
QualityWTW(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BEN | WTW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 24.66 | 14.89● |
| Forward P/E | 12.06● | 13.06 |
| P/S ratio | 1.90● | 2.47 |
| P/B ratio | 1.41● | 3.07 |
| PEG ratio | 3.21 | 0.91● |
Profitability
| Metric | BEN | WTW |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 73.80%● | 38.16% |
| Operating margin | 9.34% | 22.73%● |
| Net margin | 8.99% | 16.84%● |
| ROE | 6.70% | 20.90%● |
| ROIC | 1.38% | 11.52%● |
Dividends
| Metric | BEN | WTW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.93%● | 1.46% |
| Payout ratio | 142.86% | 22.77% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BEN | WTW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 5.65%● | 1.91% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -10.56% | 16.30%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 6.10%● | 3.84% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, BEN or WTW?
- It depends on your goal. value: WTW (lower P/E); growth: BEN (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: BEN (higher dividend yield); quality: WTW (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, they are evenly matched.
- Is BEN or WTW cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, WTW is cheaper: BEN trades at a 24.66 P/E and WTW at 14.89.
- Which has grown faster, BEN or WTW?
- Over the past five years, BEN grew revenue faster — BEN at a 5.65% CAGR versus WTW at 1.91%.
- Does BEN or WTW pay a bigger dividend?
- BEN yields 3.93% and WTW yields 1.46% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is BEN or WTW more profitable?
- WTW runs the higher net margin — BEN at 8.99% versus WTW at 16.84%.
- Which has been the better investment, BEN or WTW?
- Over the past 10-year, WTW delivered the higher annualized total return — BEN at 4.00% versus WTW at 8.87%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Franklin Resources P/E ratioWillis Towers Watson Public P/E ratioFranklin Resources dividend yieldWillis Towers Watson Public dividend yieldFranklin Resources ROEWillis Towers Watson Public ROEFranklin Resources operating marginWillis Towers Watson Public operating marginFranklin Resources revenue growthWillis Towers Watson Public revenue growthFranklin Resources free cash flowWillis Towers Watson Public free cash flow
Franklin Resources & Willis Towers Watson Public appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 18, 2026.