Which has the lower trailing P/E, BELFB or CLS?

CLS has the lower trailing P/E: BELFB trades at 62.59 and CLS at 35.99. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, BELFB or CLS?

Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — BELFB at a 8.72% CAGR versus CLS at 22.80%.

Does BELFB or CLS pay a bigger dividend?

BELFB pays a dividend (0.12% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is BELFB or CLS more profitable?

BELFB runs the higher net margin — BELFB at 8.12% versus CLS at 7.16%.

How have BELFB and CLS total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, BELFB delivered 27.85% and CLS delivered 40.78% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Bel Fuse Inc. (BELFB) vs Celestica Inc. (CLS)

A side-by-side comparison of Bel Fuse Inc. and Celestica Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

BELFB

Bel Fuse Inc.

$3.03B

$250.36TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

CLS

Celestica Inc.

$39.85B

$346.55TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — BELFB vs CLS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

BELFB +1081.5% (+28.0%/yr)CLS +2872.8% (+40.4%/yr)CLS compounded faster over this window

BELFB CLS

BELFB vs CLS: by the numbers

•CLS is the larger company ($39.85B vs $3.03B market cap).
•CLS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (35.99 vs 62.59 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•BELFB converts more revenue to profit (8.12% vs 7.16% net margin).
•CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.80% vs 8.72% CAGR).
•BELFB pays a dividend (0.12% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BELFB	CLS
P/E ratio	62.59	35.99
Forward P/E	25.47	30.38
P/S ratio	4.07	2.55
P/B ratio	3.33	16.07
EV / EBITDA	18.50	27.75
FCF yield	2.42%	1.30%

Profitability

Metric	BELFB	CLS
Gross margin	39.52%	11.59%
Operating margin	16.44%	8.13%
Net margin	8.12%	7.16%
ROE	6.64%	45.07%
ROIC	9.24%	29.75%

Dividends

Metric	BELFB	CLS
Dividend yield	0.12%	N/A
Payout ratio	7.00%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BELFB	CLS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	8.72%	22.80%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	38.52%	73.33%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	26.79%	29.00%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	81.45%	106.10%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, BELFB or CLS?: CLS has the lower trailing P/E: BELFB trades at 62.59 and CLS at 35.99. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, BELFB or CLS?: Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — BELFB at a 8.72% CAGR versus CLS at 22.80%.
Does BELFB or CLS pay a bigger dividend?: BELFB pays a dividend (0.12% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is BELFB or CLS more profitable?: BELFB runs the higher net margin — BELFB at 8.12% versus CLS at 7.16%.
How have BELFB and CLS total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, BELFB delivered 27.85% and CLS delivered 40.78% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full BELFB analysis Full CLS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Bel Fuse P/E ratio Celestica P/E ratio Bel Fuse dividend yield Bel Fuse ROE Celestica ROE Bel Fuse operating margin Celestica operating margin Bel Fuse revenue growth Celestica revenue growth Bel Fuse free cash flow Celestica free cash flow

Bel Fuse & Celestica appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 10, 2026.