Which has the lower trailing P/E, BE or WM?

WM has the lower trailing P/E: BE trades at 364.85 and WM at 30.24. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, BE or WM?

Over the past five years, BE grew revenue faster — BE at a 28.98% CAGR versus WM at 9.22%.

Does BE or WM pay a bigger dividend?

WM pays a dividend (1.64% yield), while BE has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is BE or WM more profitable?

WM runs the higher net margin — BE at 7.87% versus WM at 11.12%.

How have BE and WM total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, BE delivered 67.50% and WM delivered 8.67% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) vs Waste Management, Inc. (WM)

A side-by-side comparison of Bloom Energy Corporation and Waste Management, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Bloom Energy Corporation

$81.22B

$275.75IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Waste Management, Inc.

$85.32B

$213.46IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — BE vs WM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8y

BE +1008.9% (+35.1%/yr)WM +203.8% (+14.9%/yr)BE compounded faster over this window

BE WM

BE vs WM: by the numbers

•WM is the larger company ($85.32B vs $81.22B market cap).
•WM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (30.24 vs 364.85 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•WM converts more revenue to profit (11.12% vs 7.87% net margin).
•BE grew revenue faster over the past five years (28.98% vs 9.22% CAGR).
•WM pays a dividend (1.64% yield), while BE has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BE	WM
P/E ratio	364.85	30.24
Forward P/E	103.15	26.32
P/S ratio	26.09	3.32
P/B ratio	50.38	8.60
EV / EBITDA	201.98	13.92
FCF yield	0.77%	4.19%

Profitability

Metric	BE	WM
Gross margin	31.24%	35.04%
Operating margin	11.24%	18.54%
Net margin	7.87%	11.12%
ROE	15.19%	28.74%
ROIC	7.65%	9.01%

Dividends

Metric	BE	WM
Dividend yield	N/A	1.64%
Payout ratio	N/A	50.14%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BE	WM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	28.98%	9.22%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	13.68%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	38.76%	7.05%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	67.50%	8.67%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, BE or WM?: WM has the lower trailing P/E: BE trades at 364.85 and WM at 30.24. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, BE or WM?: Over the past five years, BE grew revenue faster — BE at a 28.98% CAGR versus WM at 9.22%.
Does BE or WM pay a bigger dividend?: WM pays a dividend (1.64% yield), while BE has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is BE or WM more profitable?: WM runs the higher net margin — BE at 7.87% versus WM at 11.12%.
How have BE and WM total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, BE delivered 67.50% and WM delivered 8.67% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full BE analysis Full WM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Bloom Energy P/E ratio Waste Management P/E ratio Waste Management dividend yield Bloom Energy ROE Waste Management ROE Bloom Energy operating margin Waste Management operating margin Bloom Energy revenue growth Waste Management revenue growth Bloom Energy free cash flow Waste Management free cash flow

Bloom Energy & Waste Management appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 10, 2026.