Which has grown faster, BE or WM?

Over the past five years, BE grew revenue faster — BE at a 24.12% CAGR versus WM at 10.25%.

Does BE or WM pay a bigger dividend?

WM pays a dividend (1.69% yield) while BE does not currently pay one.

Is BE or WM more profitable?

WM runs the higher net margin — BE at 0.25% versus WM at 10.99%.

Which has been the better investment, BE or WM?

Over the past 5-year, BE delivered the higher annualized total return — BE at 58.91% versus WM at 15.24%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) vs Waste Management, Inc. (WM)

WM leads on 10 of 13 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Bloom Energy Corporation and Waste Management, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 30, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Bloom Energy Corporation

$78.22B

$275.01Industrials

Waste Management, Inc.

$89.70B

$223.37Industrials

Total return — BE vs WM

growth of $100 · last 8y

BE +1000.0%WM +154.3%BE compounded faster

BE WM

BE vs WM: by the numbers

•WM is the larger company ($89.70B vs $78.22B market cap).
•WM converts more revenue to profit (10.99% vs 0.25% net margin).
•BE grew revenue faster over the past five years (24.12% vs 10.25% CAGR).
•WM pays a dividend (1.69% yield) while BE does not currently pay one.

Which is better, BE or WM?

Metric tally: BE 3 · WM 10

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthBE(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityWM(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BE	WM
P/E ratio	—	32.33
Forward P/E	63.29	24.24●
P/S ratio	35.90	3.55●
P/B ratio	95.42	9.01●
PEG ratio	—	2.36
EV / EBITDA	347.82	14.74●
FCF yield	0.27%	3.64%●

Profitability

Metric	BE	WM
Gross margin	31.11%	32.06%●
Operating margin	8.24%	18.46%●
Net margin	0.25%	10.99%●
ROE	0.65%	27.88%●
ROIC	1.89%	8.88%●

Dividends

Metric	BE	WM
Dividend yield	—	1.69%
Payout ratio	—	56.25%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BE	WM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	24.12%●	10.25%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	—	13.68%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	19.23%●	7.28%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	58.91%●	11.60%

Frequently asked

Which is better, BE or WM?: It depends on your goal. growth: BE (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: WM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, WM leads 10 to 3.
Which has grown faster, BE or WM?: Over the past five years, BE grew revenue faster — BE at a 24.12% CAGR versus WM at 10.25%.
Does BE or WM pay a bigger dividend?: WM pays a dividend (1.69% yield) while BE does not currently pay one.
Is BE or WM more profitable?: WM runs the higher net margin — BE at 0.25% versus WM at 10.99%.
Which has been the better investment, BE or WM?: Over the past 5-year, BE delivered the higher annualized total return — BE at 58.91% versus WM at 15.24%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full BE analysis Full WM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Bloom Energy P/E ratio Waste Management P/E ratio Bloom Energy dividend yield Waste Management dividend yield Bloom Energy ROE Waste Management ROE Bloom Energy operating margin Waste Management operating margin Bloom Energy revenue growth Waste Management revenue growth Bloom Energy free cash flow Waste Management free cash flow

Bloom Energy & Waste Management appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 30, 2026.