Which has the lower trailing P/E, BE or VRT?

VRT has the lower trailing P/E: BE trades at 365.88 and VRT at 57.34. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, BE or VRT?

Over the past five years, BE grew revenue faster — BE at a 28.98% CAGR versus VRT at 18.93%.

Does BE or VRT pay a bigger dividend?

VRT pays a dividend (0.09% yield), while BE has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is BE or VRT more profitable?

VRT runs the higher net margin — BE at 7.87% versus VRT at 15.09%.

How have BE and VRT total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, BE delivered 69.63% and VRT delivered 60.16% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) vs Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT)

A side-by-side comparison of Bloom Energy Corporation and Vertiv Holdings Co across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Bloom Energy Corporation

$81.45B

$276.53IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 22, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

VRT

Vertiv Holdings Co

$97.58B

$253.46IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 22, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — BE vs VRT

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8y

BE +1062.3% (+35.9%/yr)VRT +2582.9% (+50.9%/yr)VRT compounded faster over this window

BE VRT

BE vs VRT: by the numbers

•VRT is the larger company ($97.58B vs $81.45B market cap).
•VRT trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (57.34 vs 365.88 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•VRT converts more revenue to profit (15.09% vs 7.87% net margin).
•BE grew revenue faster over the past five years (28.98% vs 18.93% CAGR).
•VRT pays a dividend (0.09% yield), while BE has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BE	VRT
P/E ratio	365.88	57.34
Forward P/E	102.46	37.70
P/S ratio	26.16	8.50
P/B ratio	50.52	20.51
EV / EBITDA	202.55	38.59
FCF yield	0.77%	3.00%

Profitability

Metric	BE	VRT
Gross margin	31.24%	37.52%
Operating margin	11.24%	19.12%
Net margin	7.87%	15.09%
ROE	15.19%	36.40%
ROIC	7.65%	20.78%

Dividends

Metric	BE	VRT
Dividend yield	N/A	0.09%
Payout ratio	N/A	5.09%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BE	VRT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	28.98%	18.93%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	38.76%	50.29%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	69.63%	60.16%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, BE or VRT?: VRT has the lower trailing P/E: BE trades at 365.88 and VRT at 57.34. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, BE or VRT?: Over the past five years, BE grew revenue faster — BE at a 28.98% CAGR versus VRT at 18.93%.
Does BE or VRT pay a bigger dividend?: VRT pays a dividend (0.09% yield), while BE has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is BE or VRT more profitable?: VRT runs the higher net margin — BE at 7.87% versus VRT at 15.09%.
How have BE and VRT total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, BE delivered 69.63% and VRT delivered 60.16% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full BE analysis Full VRT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Bloom Energy P/E ratio Vertiv P/E ratio Vertiv dividend yield Bloom Energy ROE Vertiv ROE Bloom Energy operating margin Vertiv operating margin Bloom Energy revenue growth Vertiv revenue growth Bloom Energy free cash flow Vertiv free cash flow

Bloom Energy & Vertiv appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.