Which has grown faster, BE or TT?

Over the past five years, BE grew revenue faster — BE at a 24.12% CAGR versus TT at 10.98%.

Does BE or TT pay a bigger dividend?

TT pays a dividend (0.84% yield) while BE does not currently pay one.

Is BE or TT more profitable?

TT runs the higher net margin — BE at 0.25% versus TT at 13.42%.

Which has been the better investment, BE or TT?

Over the past 5-year, BE delivered the higher annualized total return — BE at 63.17% versus TT at 26.86%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) vs Trane Technologies plc (TT)

TT leads on 10 of 13 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Bloom Energy Corporation and Trane Technologies plc across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 24, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Bloom Energy Corporation

$91.59B

$321.98Industrials

Trane Technologies plc

$104.86B

$474.34Industrials

Total return — BE vs TT

growth of $100 · last 8y

BE +1187.9%TT +571.3%BE compounded faster

BE TT

BE vs TT: by the numbers

•TT is the larger company ($104.86B vs $91.59B market cap).
•TT converts more revenue to profit (13.42% vs 0.25% net margin).
•BE grew revenue faster over the past five years (24.12% vs 10.98% CAGR).
•TT pays a dividend (0.84% yield) while BE does not currently pay one.

Which is better, BE or TT?

Metric tally: BE 3 · TT 10

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthBE(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityTT(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BE	TT
P/E ratio	—	36.69
Forward P/E	73.67	27.87●
P/S ratio	42.03	4.90●
P/B ratio	111.71	12.29●
PEG ratio	—	2.06
EV / EBITDA	916.26	25.64●
FCF yield	0.23%	2.99%●

Profitability

Metric	BE	TT
Gross margin	31.11%	35.92%●
Operating margin	8.24%	18.17%●
Net margin	0.25%	13.42%●
ROE	0.65%	33.65%●
ROIC	1.89%	20.26%●

Dividends

Metric	BE	TT
Dividend yield	—	0.84%
Payout ratio	—	30.40%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BE	TT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	24.12%●	10.98%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	—	29.75%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	19.23%●	11.10%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	63.17%●	22.96%

Frequently asked

Which is better, BE or TT?: It depends on your goal. growth: BE (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: TT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, TT leads 10 to 3.
Which has grown faster, BE or TT?: Over the past five years, BE grew revenue faster — BE at a 24.12% CAGR versus TT at 10.98%.
Does BE or TT pay a bigger dividend?: TT pays a dividend (0.84% yield) while BE does not currently pay one.
Is BE or TT more profitable?: TT runs the higher net margin — BE at 0.25% versus TT at 13.42%.
Which has been the better investment, BE or TT?: Over the past 5-year, BE delivered the higher annualized total return — BE at 63.17% versus TT at 26.86%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full BE analysis Full TT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Bloom Energy P/E ratio Trane Technologies P/E ratio Bloom Energy dividend yield Trane Technologies dividend yield Bloom Energy ROE Trane Technologies ROE Bloom Energy operating margin Trane Technologies operating margin Bloom Energy revenue growth Trane Technologies revenue growth Bloom Energy free cash flow Trane Technologies free cash flow

Bloom Energy & Trane Technologies appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 24, 2026.