Which has the lower trailing P/E, BE or TT?

TT has the lower trailing P/E: BE trades at 365.88 and TT at 33.19. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, BE or TT?

Over the past five years, BE grew revenue faster — BE at a 28.98% CAGR versus TT at 10.44%.

Does BE or TT pay a bigger dividend?

TT pays a dividend (0.92% yield), while BE has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is BE or TT more profitable?

TT runs the higher net margin — BE at 7.87% versus TT at 13.28%.

How have BE and TT total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, BE delivered 69.63% and TT delivered 19.98% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) vs Trane Technologies plc (TT)

A side-by-side comparison of Bloom Energy Corporation and Trane Technologies plc across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Bloom Energy Corporation

$81.45B

$276.53IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 22, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Trane Technologies plc

$96.33B

$437.82IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 22, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — BE vs TT

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8y

BE +1008.9% (+35.1%/yr)TT +615.9% (+27.9%/yr)BE compounded faster over this window

BE TT

BE vs TT: by the numbers

•TT is the larger company ($96.33B vs $81.45B market cap).
•TT trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (33.19 vs 365.88 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•TT converts more revenue to profit (13.28% vs 7.87% net margin).
•BE grew revenue faster over the past five years (28.98% vs 10.44% CAGR).
•TT pays a dividend (0.92% yield), while BE has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BE	TT
P/E ratio	365.88	33.19
Forward P/E	102.46	28.66
P/S ratio	26.16	4.34
P/B ratio	50.52	11.14
EV / EBITDA	202.55	22.77
FCF yield	0.77%	3.73%

Profitability

Metric	BE	TT
Gross margin	31.24%	35.39%
Operating margin	11.24%	17.94%
Net margin	7.87%	13.28%
ROE	15.19%	34.11%
ROIC	7.65%	19.89%

Dividends

Metric	BE	TT
Dividend yield	N/A	0.92%
Payout ratio	N/A	31.01%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BE	TT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	28.98%	10.44%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	29.75%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	38.76%	11.84%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	69.63%	19.98%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, BE or TT?: TT has the lower trailing P/E: BE trades at 365.88 and TT at 33.19. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, BE or TT?: Over the past five years, BE grew revenue faster — BE at a 28.98% CAGR versus TT at 10.44%.
Does BE or TT pay a bigger dividend?: TT pays a dividend (0.92% yield), while BE has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is BE or TT more profitable?: TT runs the higher net margin — BE at 7.87% versus TT at 13.28%.
How have BE and TT total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, BE delivered 69.63% and TT delivered 19.98% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full BE analysis Full TT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Bloom Energy P/E ratio Trane Technologies P/E ratio Trane Technologies dividend yield Bloom Energy ROE Trane Technologies ROE Bloom Energy operating margin Trane Technologies operating margin Bloom Energy revenue growth Trane Technologies revenue growth Bloom Energy free cash flow Trane Technologies free cash flow

Bloom Energy & Trane Technologies appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.