Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) vs Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI)
A side-by-side comparison of Bloom Energy Corporation and Thomson Reuters Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
BE
Bloom Energy Corporation
$166.84IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
TRI
Thomson Reuters Corporation
$103.29IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — BE vs TRI
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8yBE +652.7%TRI +133.7%BE compounded faster
BE TRI
BE vs TRI: by the numbers
- •BE is the larger company ($47.46B vs $45.09B market cap).
- •TRI converts more revenue to profit (19.93% vs 0.25% net margin).
- •BE grew revenue faster over the past five years (24.12% vs 4.86% CAGR).
- •TRI pays a dividend (4.04% yield), while BE has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BE | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | N/A | 28.58 |
| Forward P/E | 87.68 | 22.44 |
| P/S ratio | 24.57 | 5.59 |
| P/B ratio | 65.29 | 3.61 |
| PEG ratio | N/A | 3.96 |
| EV / EBITDA | 238.35 | 14.99 |
| FCF yield | 0.39% | 4.89% |
Profitability
| Metric | BE | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 31.11% | 75.81% |
| Operating margin | 8.24% | 26.66% |
| Net margin | 0.25% | 19.93% |
| ROE | 0.65% | 12.89% |
| ROIC | 1.89% | 10.13% |
Dividends
| Metric | BE | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 4.04% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 116.05% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BE | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 24.12% | 4.86% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 7.22% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 19.23% | 9.45% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 55.40% | -0.48% |
Frequently asked
- Which has grown faster, BE or TRI?
- Over the past five years, BE grew revenue faster — BE at a 24.12% CAGR versus TRI at 4.86%.
- Does BE or TRI pay a bigger dividend?
- TRI pays a dividend (4.04% yield), while BE has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is BE or TRI more profitable?
- TRI runs the higher net margin — BE at 0.25% versus TRI at 19.93%.
- How have BE and TRI total returns compared?
- Over the past 5 years, BE delivered 55.40% and TRI delivered 9.18% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Bloom Energy P/E ratioThomson Reuters P/E ratioBloom Energy dividend yieldThomson Reuters dividend yieldBloom Energy ROEThomson Reuters ROEBloom Energy operating marginThomson Reuters operating marginBloom Energy revenue growthThomson Reuters revenue growthBloom Energy free cash flowThomson Reuters free cash flow
Bloom Energy & Thomson Reuters appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.