Which has the lower trailing P/E, BE or PWR?

PWR has the lower trailing P/E: BE trades at 371.47 and PWR at 70.62. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, BE or PWR?

Over the past five years, BE grew revenue faster — BE at a 28.98% CAGR versus PWR at 23.02%.

Does BE or PWR pay a bigger dividend?

PWR pays a dividend (0.07% yield), while BE has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is BE or PWR more profitable?

BE runs the higher net margin — BE at 7.87% versus PWR at 4.08%.

How have BE and PWR total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, BE delivered 69.63% and PWR delivered 41.43% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) vs Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR)

A side-by-side comparison of Bloom Energy Corporation and Quanta Services, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Bloom Energy Corporation

$82.69B

$280.76IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 17, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

PWR

Quanta Services, Inc.

$92.69B

$616.54IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 17, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — BE vs PWR

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8y

BE +1003.0% (+35.0%/yr)PWR +1906.3% (+45.5%/yr)PWR compounded faster over this window

BE PWR

BE vs PWR: by the numbers

•PWR is the larger company ($92.69B vs $82.69B market cap).
•PWR trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (70.62 vs 371.47 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•BE converts more revenue to profit (7.87% vs 4.08% net margin).
•BE grew revenue faster over the past five years (28.98% vs 23.02% CAGR).
•PWR pays a dividend (0.07% yield), while BE has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BE	PWR
P/E ratio	371.47	70.62
Forward P/E	104.03	36.85
P/S ratio	26.56	2.83
P/B ratio	51.30	9.62
EV / EBITDA	205.65	32.97
FCF yield	0.76%	2.58%

Profitability

Metric	BE	PWR
Gross margin	31.24%	14.42%
Operating margin	11.24%	6.20%
Net margin	7.87%	4.08%
ROE	15.19%	13.88%
ROIC	7.65%	8.49%

Dividends

Metric	BE	PWR
Dividend yield	N/A	0.07%
Payout ratio	N/A	4.93%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BE	PWR
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	28.98%	23.02%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	16.88%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	38.76%	42.82%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	69.63%	41.43%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, BE or PWR?: PWR has the lower trailing P/E: BE trades at 371.47 and PWR at 70.62. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, BE or PWR?: Over the past five years, BE grew revenue faster — BE at a 28.98% CAGR versus PWR at 23.02%.
Does BE or PWR pay a bigger dividend?: PWR pays a dividend (0.07% yield), while BE has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is BE or PWR more profitable?: BE runs the higher net margin — BE at 7.87% versus PWR at 4.08%.
How have BE and PWR total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, BE delivered 69.63% and PWR delivered 41.43% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full BE analysis Full PWR analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Bloom Energy P/E ratio Quanta Services P/E ratio Quanta Services dividend yield Bloom Energy ROE Quanta Services ROE Bloom Energy operating margin Quanta Services operating margin Bloom Energy revenue growth Quanta Services revenue growth Bloom Energy free cash flow Quanta Services free cash flow

Bloom Energy & Quanta Services appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.