Which has grown faster, BE or PWR?

Over the past five years, BE grew revenue faster — BE at a 24.12% CAGR versus PWR at 21.91%.

Does BE or PWR pay a bigger dividend?

PWR pays a dividend (0.06% yield) while BE does not currently pay one.

Is BE or PWR more profitable?

PWR runs the higher net margin — BE at 0.25% versus PWR at 3.72%.

Which has been the better investment, BE or PWR?

Over the past 5-year, BE delivered the higher annualized total return — BE at 67.91% versus PWR at 40.90%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) vs Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR)

PWR leads on 8 of 13 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Bloom Energy Corporation and Quanta Services, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 21, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Bloom Energy Corporation

$93.56B

$328.91Industrials

PWR

Quanta Services, Inc.

$105.38B

$702.25Industrials

Total return — BE vs PWR

growth of $100 · last 8y

BE +1215.6%PWR +2023.5%PWR compounded faster

BE PWR

BE vs PWR: by the numbers

•PWR is the larger company ($105.38B vs $93.56B market cap).
•PWR converts more revenue to profit (3.72% vs 0.25% net margin).
•BE grew revenue faster over the past five years (24.12% vs 21.91% CAGR).
•PWR pays a dividend (0.06% yield) while BE does not currently pay one.

Which is better, BE or PWR?

Metric tally: BE 5 · PWR 8

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthBE(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityPWR(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BE	PWR
P/E ratio	—	96.33
Forward P/E	75.51	42.86●
P/S ratio	42.94	3.56●
P/B ratio	114.12	11.81●
PEG ratio	—	5.33
EV / EBITDA	935.93	46.89●
FCF yield	0.22%	1.57%●

Profitability

Metric	BE	PWR
Gross margin	31.11%●	13.59%
Operating margin	8.24%●	5.76%
Net margin	0.25%	3.72%●
ROE	0.65%	12.33%●
ROIC	1.89%	7.07%●

Dividends

Metric	BE	PWR
Dividend yield	—	0.06%
Payout ratio	—	6.11%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BE	PWR
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	24.12%●	21.91%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	—	16.88%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	19.23%●	17.91%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	67.91%●	52.49%

Frequently asked

Which is better, BE or PWR?: It depends on your goal. growth: BE (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: PWR (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, PWR leads 8 to 5.
Which has grown faster, BE or PWR?: Over the past five years, BE grew revenue faster — BE at a 24.12% CAGR versus PWR at 21.91%.
Does BE or PWR pay a bigger dividend?: PWR pays a dividend (0.06% yield) while BE does not currently pay one.
Is BE or PWR more profitable?: PWR runs the higher net margin — BE at 0.25% versus PWR at 3.72%.
Which has been the better investment, BE or PWR?: Over the past 5-year, BE delivered the higher annualized total return — BE at 67.91% versus PWR at 40.90%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full BE analysis Full PWR analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Bloom Energy P/E ratio Quanta Services P/E ratio Bloom Energy dividend yield Quanta Services dividend yield Bloom Energy ROE Quanta Services ROE Bloom Energy operating margin Quanta Services operating margin Bloom Energy revenue growth Quanta Services revenue growth Bloom Energy free cash flow Quanta Services free cash flow

Bloom Energy & Quanta Services appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 21, 2026.