Which has the lower trailing P/E, BE or NOC?

NOC has the lower trailing P/E: BE trades at 287.48 and NOC at 16.64. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, BE or NOC?

Over the past five years, BE grew revenue faster — BE at a 28.98% CAGR versus NOC at 2.67%.

Does BE or NOC pay a bigger dividend?

NOC pays a dividend (1.83% yield), while BE has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is BE or NOC more profitable?

NOC runs the higher net margin — BE at 7.87% versus NOC at 10.48%.

How have BE and NOC total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, BE delivered 58.08% and NOC delivered 11.18% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) vs Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC)

A side-by-side comparison of Bloom Energy Corporation and Northrop Grumman Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 3, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Bloom Energy Corporation

$69.34B

$235.42IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 3, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT

NOC

Northrop Grumman Corporation

$75.01B

$528.02IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 3, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT

Total return — BE vs NOC

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8y

BE +769.1% (+31.0%/yr)NOC +86.8% (+8.1%/yr)BE compounded faster over this window

BE NOC

BE vs NOC: by the numbers

•NOC is the larger company ($75.01B vs $69.34B market cap).
•NOC trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (16.64 vs 287.48 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•NOC converts more revenue to profit (10.48% vs 7.87% net margin).
•BE grew revenue faster over the past five years (28.98% vs 2.67% CAGR).
•NOC pays a dividend (1.83% yield), while BE has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BE	NOC
P/E ratio	287.48	16.64
Forward P/E	81.37	18.10
P/S ratio	22.57	1.74
P/B ratio	43.58	4.17
EV / EBITDA	174.77	15.04
FCF yield	0.89%	4.89%

Profitability

Metric	BE	NOC
Gross margin	31.24%	20.06%
Operating margin	11.24%	10.18%
Net margin	7.87%	10.48%
ROE	15.19%	25.14%
ROIC	7.65%	9.97%

Dividends

Metric	BE	NOC
Dividend yield	N/A	1.83%
Payout ratio	N/A	32.81%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BE	NOC
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	28.98%	2.67%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	8.84%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	38.76%	6.92%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	58.08%	9.06%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, BE or NOC?: NOC has the lower trailing P/E: BE trades at 287.48 and NOC at 16.64. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, BE or NOC?: Over the past five years, BE grew revenue faster — BE at a 28.98% CAGR versus NOC at 2.67%.
Does BE or NOC pay a bigger dividend?: NOC pays a dividend (1.83% yield), while BE has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is BE or NOC more profitable?: NOC runs the higher net margin — BE at 7.87% versus NOC at 10.48%.
How have BE and NOC total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, BE delivered 58.08% and NOC delivered 11.18% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full BE analysis Full NOC analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Bloom Energy P/E ratio Northrop Grumman P/E ratio Northrop Grumman dividend yield Bloom Energy ROE Northrop Grumman ROE Bloom Energy operating margin Northrop Grumman operating margin Bloom Energy revenue growth Northrop Grumman revenue growth Bloom Energy free cash flow Northrop Grumman free cash flow

Bloom Energy & Northrop Grumman appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 3, 2026.