Which has grown faster, BE or NOC?

Over the past five years, BE grew revenue faster — BE at a 24.12% CAGR versus NOC at 2.56%.

Does BE or NOC pay a bigger dividend?

NOC pays a dividend (1.98% yield) while BE does not currently pay one.

Is BE or NOC more profitable?

NOC runs the higher net margin — BE at 0.25% versus NOC at 10.80%.

Which has been the better investment, BE or NOC?

Over the past 5-year, BE delivered the higher annualized total return — BE at 55.86% versus NOC at 10.68%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) vs Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC)

NOC leads on 9 of 13 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Bloom Energy Corporation and Northrop Grumman Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 29, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Bloom Energy Corporation

$71.69B

$252.02Industrials

NOC

Northrop Grumman Corporation

$71.02B

$500.03Industrials

Total return — BE vs NOC

growth of $100 · last 8y

BE +908.1%NOC +69.2%BE compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

BE NOC

BE vs NOC: by the numbers

•BE is the larger company ($71.69B vs $71.02B market cap).
•NOC converts more revenue to profit (10.80% vs 0.25% net margin).
•BE grew revenue faster over the past five years (24.12% vs 2.56% CAGR).
•NOC pays a dividend (1.98% yield) while BE does not currently pay one.

Which is better, BE or NOC?

Metric tally: BE 4 · NOC 9

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthBE(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityNOC(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BE	NOC
P/E ratio	—	15.65
Forward P/E	57.66	16.59●
P/S ratio	32.90	1.68●
P/B ratio	87.44	4.16●
PEG ratio	—	7.41
EV / EBITDA	318.84	13.90●
FCF yield	0.29%	4.64%●

Profitability

Metric	BE	NOC
Gross margin	31.11%●	20.52%
Operating margin	8.24%	11.08%●
Net margin	0.25%	10.80%●
ROE	0.65%	26.74%●
ROIC	1.89%	9.21%●

Dividends

Metric	BE	NOC
Dividend yield	—	1.98%
Payout ratio	—	33.91%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BE	NOC
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	24.12%●	2.56%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	—	8.84%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	19.23%●	-3.15%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	55.86%●	7.75%

Frequently asked

Which is better, BE or NOC?: It depends on your goal. growth: BE (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: NOC (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, NOC leads 9 to 4.
Which has grown faster, BE or NOC?: Over the past five years, BE grew revenue faster — BE at a 24.12% CAGR versus NOC at 2.56%.
Does BE or NOC pay a bigger dividend?: NOC pays a dividend (1.98% yield) while BE does not currently pay one.
Is BE or NOC more profitable?: NOC runs the higher net margin — BE at 0.25% versus NOC at 10.80%.
Which has been the better investment, BE or NOC?: Over the past 5-year, BE delivered the higher annualized total return — BE at 55.86% versus NOC at 10.68%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full BE analysis Full NOC analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Bloom Energy P/E ratio Northrop Grumman P/E ratio Bloom Energy dividend yield Northrop Grumman dividend yield Bloom Energy ROE Northrop Grumman ROE Bloom Energy operating margin Northrop Grumman operating margin Bloom Energy revenue growth Northrop Grumman revenue growth Bloom Energy free cash flow Northrop Grumman free cash flow

Bloom Energy & Northrop Grumman appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 29, 2026.