Which has the lower trailing P/E, BE or CLS?

CLS has the lower trailing P/E: BE trades at 364.85 and CLS at 35.99. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, BE or CLS?

Over the past five years, BE grew revenue faster — BE at a 28.98% CAGR versus CLS at 22.80%.

Is BE or CLS more profitable?

BE runs the higher net margin — BE at 7.87% versus CLS at 7.16%.

How have BE and CLS total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, BE delivered 67.50% and CLS delivered 106.10% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) vs Celestica Inc. (CLS)

A side-by-side comparison of Bloom Energy Corporation and Celestica Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Different business models: BE is classified in Industrials; CLS is classified in Technology. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

Bloom Energy Corporation

$81.22B

$275.75IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

CLS

Celestica Inc.

$39.85B

$346.55TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — BE vs CLS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8y

BE +934.0% (+33.9%/yr)CLS +2544.1% (+50.6%/yr)CLS compounded faster over this window

BE CLS

BE vs CLS: by the numbers

•BE is the larger company ($81.22B vs $39.85B market cap).
•CLS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (35.99 vs 364.85 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•BE converts more revenue to profit (7.87% vs 7.16% net margin).
•BE grew revenue faster over the past five years (28.98% vs 22.80% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BE	CLS
P/E ratio	364.85	35.99
Forward P/E	103.15	30.38
P/S ratio	26.09	2.55
P/B ratio	50.38	16.07
EV / EBITDA	201.98	27.75
FCF yield	0.77%	1.30%

Profitability

Metric	BE	CLS
Gross margin	31.24%	11.59%
Operating margin	11.24%	8.13%
Net margin	7.87%	7.16%
ROE	15.19%	45.07%
ROIC	7.65%	29.75%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BE	CLS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	28.98%	22.80%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	73.33%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	38.76%	29.00%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	67.50%	106.10%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, BE or CLS?: CLS has the lower trailing P/E: BE trades at 364.85 and CLS at 35.99. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, BE or CLS?: Over the past five years, BE grew revenue faster — BE at a 28.98% CAGR versus CLS at 22.80%.
Is BE or CLS more profitable?: BE runs the higher net margin — BE at 7.87% versus CLS at 7.16%.
How have BE and CLS total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, BE delivered 67.50% and CLS delivered 106.10% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full BE analysis Full CLS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Bloom Energy P/E ratio Celestica P/E ratio Bloom Energy ROE Celestica ROE Bloom Energy operating margin Celestica operating margin Bloom Energy revenue growth Celestica revenue growth Bloom Energy free cash flow Celestica free cash flow

Bloom Energy & Celestica appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 10, 2026.