Which has grown faster, BDX or NTRA?

Over the past five years, NTRA grew revenue faster — BDX at a 1.22% CAGR versus NTRA at 39.92%.

Does BDX or NTRA pay a bigger dividend?

BDX pays a dividend (2.23% yield), while NTRA has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is BDX or NTRA more profitable?

BDX runs the higher net margin — BDX at 4.52% versus NTRA at -7.11%.

How have BDX and NTRA total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, BDX delivered 4.24% and NTRA delivered 43.39% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Becton, Dickinson and Company (BDX) vs Natera, Inc. (NTRA)

A side-by-side comparison of Becton, Dickinson and Company and Natera, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 2, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

BDX

Becton, Dickinson and Company

$48.72B

$176.80HealthcareDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

NTRA

Natera, Inc.

$58.77B

$410.35HealthcareDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — BDX vs NTRA

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

BDX +51.5% (+4.2%/yr)NTRA +3613.4% (+43.5%/yr)NTRA compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

BDX NTRA

BDX vs NTRA: by the numbers

•NTRA is the larger company ($58.77B vs $48.72B market cap).
•BDX is profitable (4.52% net margin) while NTRA runs a net loss (-7.11%).
•NTRA grew revenue faster over the past five years (39.92% vs 1.22% CAGR).
•BDX pays a dividend (2.23% yield), while NTRA has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BDX	NTRA
P/E ratio	53.25	N/A
Forward P/E	13.37	N/A
PEG ratio	3.22	N/A
P/S ratio	2.34	21.71
P/B ratio	2.00	32.26
EV / EBITDA	11.77	N/A
FCF yield	5.35%	0.12%

Profitability

Metric	BDX	NTRA
Gross margin	46.12%	65.30%
Operating margin	9.83%	-10.70%
Net margin	4.52%	-7.11%
ROE	3.85%	-10.56%
ROIC	3.72%	-13.26%

Dividends

Metric	BDX	NTRA
Dividend yield	2.23%	N/A
Payout ratio	119.73%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BDX	NTRA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	1.22%	39.92%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	16.26%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-9.10%	N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)	0.79%	29.45%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, BDX or NTRA?: Over the past five years, NTRA grew revenue faster — BDX at a 1.22% CAGR versus NTRA at 39.92%.
Does BDX or NTRA pay a bigger dividend?: BDX pays a dividend (2.23% yield), while NTRA has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is BDX or NTRA more profitable?: BDX runs the higher net margin — BDX at 4.52% versus NTRA at -7.11%.
How have BDX and NTRA total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, BDX delivered 4.24% and NTRA delivered 43.39% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full BDX analysis Full NTRA analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Becton, Dickinson P/E ratio Becton, Dickinson dividend yield Becton, Dickinson ROE Natera ROE Becton, Dickinson operating margin Natera operating margin Becton, Dickinson revenue growth Natera revenue growth Becton, Dickinson free cash flow Natera free cash flow

Becton, Dickinson & Natera appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks 25+ Year Dividend Growers Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 2, 2026.