Becton, Dickinson and Company (BDX) vs Illumina, Inc. (ILMN)
A side-by-side comparison of Becton, Dickinson and Company and Illumina, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 2, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
BDX
Becton, Dickinson and Company
$176.80HealthcareDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
ILMN
Illumina, Inc.
$273.04HealthcareDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — BDX vs ILMN
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yBDX +51.5% (+4.2%/yr)ILMN +48.2% (+4.0%/yr)BDX compounded faster over this window
BDX ILMN
BDX vs ILMN: by the numbers
- •BDX is the larger company ($48.72B vs $41.31B market cap).
- •ILMN trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (50.94 vs 53.25 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •ILMN converts more revenue to profit (18.36% vs 4.52% net margin).
- •ILMN grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.04% vs 1.22% CAGR).
- •BDX pays a dividend (2.23% yield), while ILMN has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BDX | ILMN |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 53.25 | 50.94 |
| Forward P/E | 13.37 | 51.00 |
| PEG ratio | 3.22 | 11.99 |
| P/S ratio | 2.34 | 9.19 |
| P/B ratio | 2.00 | 14.56 |
| EV / EBITDA | 11.77 | 35.22 |
| FCF yield | 5.35% | 2.27% |
Profitability
| Metric | BDX | ILMN |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 46.12% | 66.79% |
| Operating margin | 9.83% | 20.97% |
| Net margin | 4.52% | 18.36% |
| ROE | 3.85% | 29.07% |
| ROIC | 3.72% | 13.74% |
Dividends
| Metric | BDX | ILMN |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.23% | N/A |
| Payout ratio | 119.73% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BDX | ILMN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 1.22% | 5.04% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 16.26% | 4.22% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -9.10% | 1.03% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 0.79% | -7.09% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, BDX or ILMN?
- ILMN has the lower trailing P/E: BDX trades at 53.25 and ILMN at 50.94. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, BDX or ILMN?
- Over the past five years, ILMN grew revenue faster — BDX at a 1.22% CAGR versus ILMN at 5.04%.
- Does BDX or ILMN pay a bigger dividend?
- BDX pays a dividend (2.23% yield), while ILMN has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is BDX or ILMN more profitable?
- ILMN runs the higher net margin — BDX at 4.52% versus ILMN at 18.36%.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Becton, Dickinson P/E ratioIllumina P/E ratioBecton, Dickinson dividend yieldBecton, Dickinson ROEIllumina ROEBecton, Dickinson operating marginIllumina operating marginBecton, Dickinson revenue growthIllumina revenue growthBecton, Dickinson free cash flowIllumina free cash flow
Becton, Dickinson & Illumina appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 2, 2026.