Becton, Dickinson and Company (BDX) vs Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (EW)
A side-by-side comparison of Becton, Dickinson and Company and Edwards Lifesciences Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 12, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
BDX
Becton, Dickinson and Company
$183.58HealthcareDelayed quote: Aug 12, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
EW
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation
$93.05HealthcareDelayed quote: Aug 12, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — BDX vs EW
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yBDX +56.7% (+4.6%/yr)EW +148.2% (+9.5%/yr)EW compounded faster over this window
BDX EW
BDX vs EW: by the numbers
- •EW is the larger company ($53.58B vs $50.58B market cap).
- •EW trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (53.83 vs 54.64 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •EW converts more revenue to profit (15.43% vs 4.52% net margin).
- •EW grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.75% vs 1.22% CAGR).
- •BDX pays a dividend (2.06% yield), while EW has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BDX | EW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 54.64 | 53.83 |
| Forward P/E | 14.39 | 31.21 |
| P/S ratio | 2.40 | 8.31 |
| P/B ratio | 0.98 | 5.09 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.57 | 26.01 |
| FCF yield | 5.47% | 2.65% |
Profitability
| Metric | BDX | EW |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 46.12% | 77.98% |
| Operating margin | 9.83% | 28.09% |
| Net margin | 4.52% | 15.43% |
| ROE | 1.85% | 9.46% |
| ROIC | 4.73% | 11.40% |
Dividends
| Metric | BDX | EW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.06% | N/A |
| Payout ratio | 64.09% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BDX | EW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 1.22% | 5.75% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 16.26% | 6.87% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -8.25% | 6.41% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 1.45% | -3.36% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, BDX or EW?
- EW has the lower trailing P/E: BDX trades at 54.64 and EW at 53.83. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, BDX or EW?
- Over the past five years, EW grew revenue faster — BDX at a 1.22% CAGR versus EW at 5.75%.
- Does BDX or EW pay a bigger dividend?
- BDX pays a dividend (2.06% yield), while EW has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is BDX or EW more profitable?
- EW runs the higher net margin — BDX at 4.52% versus EW at 15.43%.
- How have BDX and EW total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, BDX delivered 4.59% and EW delivered 9.45% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Becton, Dickinson P/E ratioEdwards Lifesciences P/E ratioBecton, Dickinson dividend yieldBecton, Dickinson ROEEdwards Lifesciences ROEBecton, Dickinson operating marginEdwards Lifesciences operating marginBecton, Dickinson revenue growthEdwards Lifesciences revenue growthBecton, Dickinson free cash flowEdwards Lifesciences free cash flow
Becton, Dickinson & Edwards Lifesciences appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 12, 2026.