Becton, Dickinson and Company (BDX) vs Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (EW)
BDX leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Becton, Dickinson and Company and Edwards Lifesciences Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 27, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
BDX
Becton, Dickinson and Company
$155.92Healthcare
EW
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation
$90.78Healthcare
Total return — BDX vs EW
growth of $100 · last 25yBDX +574.4%EW +4785.0%EW compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
BDX EW
BDX vs EW: by the numbers
- •BDX is the larger company ($56.49B vs $52.27B market cap).
- •BDX trades at the lower earnings multiple (39.47 vs 48.29 P/E).
- •EW converts more revenue to profit (17.34% vs 5.33% net margin).
- •EW grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.10% vs 2.52% CAGR).
- •BDX pays a dividend (2.69% yield) while EW does not currently pay one.
Which is better, BDX or EW?
Metric tally: BDX 9 · EW 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueBDX(lower P/E)
GrowthEW(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityEW(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BDX | EW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 39.47● | 48.29 |
| Forward P/E | 11.64● | 26.89 |
| P/S ratio | 2.05● | 8.36 |
| P/B ratio | 1.81● | 5.10 |
| PEG ratio | 2.43● | 7.03 |
| EV / EBITDA | 12.96● | 26.80 |
| FCF yield | 7.18%● | 2.07% |
Profitability
| Metric | BDX | EW |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 46.48% | 78.01%● |
| Operating margin | 10.61% | 27.62%● |
| Net margin | 5.33% | 17.34%● |
| ROE | 4.72% | 10.58%● |
| ROIC | 4.73% | 11.40%● |
Dividends
| Metric | BDX | EW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.69% | — |
| Payout ratio | 71.92% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BDX | EW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 2.52% | 7.10%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 16.26%● | 6.87% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -5.41% | 8.74%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -1.62%● | -2.60% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, BDX or EW?
- It depends on your goal. value: BDX (lower P/E); growth: EW (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: EW (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, BDX leads 9 to 7.
- Is BDX or EW cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, BDX is cheaper: BDX trades at a 39.47 P/E and EW at 48.29.
- Which has grown faster, BDX or EW?
- Over the past five years, EW grew revenue faster — BDX at a 2.52% CAGR versus EW at 7.10%.
- Does BDX or EW pay a bigger dividend?
- BDX pays a dividend (2.69% yield) while EW does not currently pay one.
- Is BDX or EW more profitable?
- EW runs the higher net margin — BDX at 5.33% versus EW at 17.34%.
- Which has been the better investment, BDX or EW?
- Over the past 10-year, EW delivered the higher annualized total return — BDX at 3.62% versus EW at 10.98%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Becton, Dickinson and P/E ratioEdwards Lifesciences P/E ratioBecton, Dickinson and dividend yieldEdwards Lifesciences dividend yieldBecton, Dickinson and ROEEdwards Lifesciences ROEBecton, Dickinson and operating marginEdwards Lifesciences operating marginBecton, Dickinson and revenue growthEdwards Lifesciences revenue growthBecton, Dickinson and free cash flowEdwards Lifesciences free cash flow
Becton, Dickinson and & Edwards Lifesciences appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 27, 2026.