Becton, Dickinson and Company (BDX) vs Cigna Corporation (CI)
CI leads on 11 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Becton, Dickinson and Company and Cigna Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — BDX vs CI
growth of $100 · last 25yBDX +532.7%CI +872.9%CI compounded faster
BDX CI
BDX vs CI: by the numbers
- •CI is the larger company ($77.73B vs $53.06B market cap).
- •CI trades at the lower earnings multiple (12.46 vs 37.02 P/E).
- •BDX converts more revenue to profit (5.33% vs 2.26% net margin).
- •CI grew revenue faster over the past five years (11.28% vs 2.52% CAGR).
- •BDX pays the higher dividend yield (2.56% vs 2.09%).
Which is better, BDX or CI?
Metric tally: BDX 6 · CI 11It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCI(lower P/E)
GrowthCI(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeBDX(higher dividend yield)
QualityCI(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BDX | CI |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 37.02 | 12.46● |
| Forward P/E | 10.92 | 8.79● |
| P/S ratio | 1.92 | 0.28● |
| P/B ratio | 1.70● | 1.84 |
| PEG ratio | 2.28 | 0.15● |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.81 | 8.32● |
| FCF yield | 7.66% | 9.86%● |
Profitability
| Metric | BDX | CI |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 46.48%● | 9.30% |
| Operating margin | 10.61%● | 3.42% |
| Net margin | 5.33%● | 2.26% |
| ROE | 4.72% | 14.90%● |
| ROIC | 4.73% | 7.35%● |
Dividends
| Metric | BDX | CI |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.56%● | 2.09% |
| Payout ratio | 64.09% | 27.53% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BDX | CI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 2.52% | 11.28%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 16.26%● | -0.76% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -5.41% | -2.03%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -2.89% | 6.14%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, BDX or CI?
- It depends on your goal. value: CI (lower P/E); growth: CI (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: BDX (higher dividend yield); quality: CI (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CI leads 11 to 6.
- Is BDX or CI cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CI is cheaper: BDX trades at a 37.02 P/E and CI at 12.46.
- Which has grown faster, BDX or CI?
- Over the past five years, CI grew revenue faster — BDX at a 2.52% CAGR versus CI at 11.28%.
- Does BDX or CI pay a bigger dividend?
- BDX yields 2.56% and CI yields 2.09% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is BDX or CI more profitable?
- BDX runs the higher net margin — BDX at 5.33% versus CI at 2.26%.
- Which has been the better investment, BDX or CI?
- Over the past 10-year, CI delivered the higher annualized total return — BDX at 2.96% versus CI at 9.89%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Becton, Dickinson and P/E ratioCigna P/E ratioBecton, Dickinson and dividend yieldCigna dividend yieldBecton, Dickinson and ROECigna ROEBecton, Dickinson and operating marginCigna operating marginBecton, Dickinson and revenue growthCigna revenue growthBecton, Dickinson and free cash flowCigna free cash flow
Becton, Dickinson and & Cigna appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.