Becton, Dickinson and Company (BDX) vs Cigna Corporation (CI)
A side-by-side comparison of Becton, Dickinson and Company and Cigna Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 31, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
BDX
Becton, Dickinson and Company
$165.62HealthcareDelayed quote: Jul 31, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
CI
Cigna Corporation
$279.05HealthcareDelayed quote: Jul 31, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — BDX vs CI
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 25yBDX +975.9%CI +982.8%CI compounded faster
BDX CI
BDX vs CI: by the numbers
- •CI is the larger company ($73.82B vs $60.00B market cap).
- •CI trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (11.91 vs 41.93 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •BDX converts more revenue to profit (5.33% vs 2.27% net margin).
- •CI grew revenue faster over the past five years (11.11% vs 2.52% CAGR).
- •BDX pays the higher dividend yield (2.26% vs 2.13%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BDX | CI |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 41.93 | 11.91 |
| Forward P/E | 13.13 | 9.45 |
| P/S ratio | 2.18 | 0.27 |
| P/B ratio | 1.93 | 1.78 |
| PEG ratio | 2.58 | 0.15 |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.54 | 8.69 |
| FCF yield | 6.76% | 12.00% |
Profitability
| Metric | BDX | CI |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 46.48% | 6.36% |
| Operating margin | 10.61% | 3.46% |
| Net margin | 5.33% | 2.27% |
| ROE | 4.72% | 15.05% |
| ROIC | 4.73% | 7.35% |
Dividends
| Metric | BDX | CI |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.26% | 2.13% |
| Payout ratio | 64.09% | 27.53% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BDX | CI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 2.52% | 11.11% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 16.26% | -0.76% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -5.41% | -1.95% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -1.59% | 6.11% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, BDX or CI?
- CI has the lower trailing P/E: BDX trades at 41.93 and CI at 11.91. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, BDX or CI?
- Over the past five years, CI grew revenue faster — BDX at a 2.52% CAGR versus CI at 11.11%.
- Does BDX or CI pay a bigger dividend?
- BDX yields 2.26% and CI yields 2.13% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is BDX or CI more profitable?
- BDX runs the higher net margin — BDX at 5.33% versus CI at 2.27%.
- How have BDX and CI total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, BDX delivered 3.69% and CI delivered 9.22% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Becton, Dickinson and P/E ratioCigna P/E ratioBecton, Dickinson and dividend yieldCigna dividend yieldBecton, Dickinson and ROECigna ROEBecton, Dickinson and operating marginCigna operating marginBecton, Dickinson and revenue growthCigna revenue growthBecton, Dickinson and free cash flowCigna free cash flow
Becton, Dickinson and & Cigna appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 31, 2026.